Stress from Cadaver Dissection Linked to Learning Conditions: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa
Nnaka, J. A.; Ezeike, V. U.; Thompson, K.; Okafor, I. A.
10.1101/2024.07.09.24310166 medRxivShow abstract
ObjectiveThis study examined the relationship between students perceptions of cadaver dissection (CD) and some learning conditions during CD. MethodsThis is a cross-sectional study involving 2968 medical students and graduates exposed to CD at nine countries systematically and proportionally selected from Sub-Saharan African countries based on their ranking on the four World Bank indices of development and education: population, literacy, human capital index (HCI), and human development index (HDI). A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect relevant data on learning conditions during CD experience of the participants, using online channels, including email, Whatsapp, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. ResultsAbout half (48.76%) of the participants perceived CD as stressful, while 51.24% thought otherwise. However, 57% of participants from institutions where a CD session lasts three hours described their experience as stressful, whereas 69.67% of participants whose institution spent one hour in a single CD session agreed that CD is not stressful. Similarly, 60.63% of participants from institutions with a student-donor ratio between 5 to 10 students per cadaver described their experience as not stressful. In comparison, 57.51% of participants from institutions with a student-donor ratio of 10-20 students per donor and 53.80% of participants from institutions with over 20 students per donor described their experience as stressful. ConclusionsStudents from institutions with CD instructors, shorter CD sessions, and a smaller student-donor ratio are more likely to perceive CD as stress-free. Providing more support for students during CD and reducing time for CD may be an antidote to CD-related stress.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions, attitudes, and challenges regarding continuing professional development among Ethiopian Medical Laboratory professionals: A mixed-method study 96%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 96%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Medical Students’ Knowledge, Attitudes, and Motivation towards Antimicrobial Resistance Efforts in Eastern Uganda 96%
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice related to the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate medical students in Indonesia: a nationwide cross-sectional study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 96%
- Data Driven Monitoring in Community Based Management of SAM children using Psychometric Techniques: An Operational Framework 93%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s Awareness of Obstetric Fistula and its Associated Factors Among Reproductive-Age Women in Ethiopia: A Multilevel Analysis Based on National Survey Data 94%
- Impact of COVID-19 on College Students' at One of the Most Diverse Campuses in the United States: A Factor Analysis of Survey Data 94%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge, perception, and attitude toward premarital screening among university students in Kurdistan region- Iraq 95%
- Application and Evaluation of Flipped Teaching Based on Video Conference in Standardized Training for Internal Medicine Residents 95%
- Determinants of practice location choices among physicians and medical students in Mali: insights into addressing medical deserts through evidence-based strategies 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.