Exploring The Association of Student Perceptions of Their Teachers' Science Instruction and Emotional Engagement and The Variance between Grade Level
Xia, X.; Tai, R. H.
Show abstract
AbstractPrevious research has consistently shown students have higher learning interests attitudes, and motivation toward science in elementary compared to middle and high school. However, the key predictors behind the observed differences in engagement levels across grade levels remain unclear. This study aims to identify the association between students perceptions of science instruction and their emotional engagement, as well as examine the differences across various educational stages. A multilevel random effect model was employed to investigate this association. In addition, the analysis examined whether the associations vary between grade levels. A sample of 6465 students from 25 schools participated in the study. This study shows that students in higher grades have significantly lower emotional engagement compared to third-grade students. Similarly, students in higher grades have significantly lower values on perceptions of science instruction of interesting science and understandable science decrease compared to third grade. Findings reveal significant associations between students perceptions of science instruction, both in perceiving interesting science instruction and understandable science instruction, and their emotional engagement in science learning. The interaction term (Perception of Interesting Science Instruction x Grade) of Grades four, six through eight, and grade 12 are statistically significantly related to emotional engagement, indicating that more positive slopes correspond to high-grade level than third-grade students. The increase in students perception of interesting science has the steepest slope of improvement in students emotional engagement in 6th grade. We find no statistically significant difference between grades in students perception of understandable science and emotional engagement. Interesting and understandable science classes have positive correlations with students emotional engagement in science learning. For future studies, it is worth exploring science instruction during transition grades to better address and mitigate the observed difference in emotional engagement.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticipatory Emotions and Academic Performance: The Role of Boredom in a Preservice Teachers' Lab Experience 96%
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 91%
- Self-learning on COVID-19 among medical students and their preparedness to participate in government's COVID-19 response in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Target Objects from Gaze Behavior during a Virtual Navigation Task 90%
- Gender, race and parenthood impact academic productivity during the COVID-19 pandemic: from survey to action. 90%
- Enhanced Subjective Performance Achievement in Wind Instrument Playing through Positive Memory Recall: Effects of Sympathetic Activation and Emotional Valence 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Education influences knowledge about environmental issues in Washington, DC, USA 90%
- Rapid adaptation and remote delivery of undergraduate research training during the COVID 19 Pandemic 88%
- Analysis of the risk and protective roles of work-related and individual variables in burnout syndrome in nurses 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Breaking barriers: The effect of protected characteristics and their intersectionality on career transition in academics 92%
- An innovative approach to using an intensive field course to build scientific and professional skills 91%
- A Systems Change Framework for Evaluating Academic Equity and Inclusion in an Ecology & Evolution Graduate Program 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.