Back

The human cortical motor map in post-stroke hemiparesis in the presence of treatment-related clinically important recovery

Kitago, T.; Silverstein, J.; Gerber, M. B.; Thomas, C.; Gerber, L. M.; Thickbroom, G. W.; Edwards, D. J.

2024-07-03 neurology
10.1101/2024.07.01.24309575 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesTo determine if intervention-related clinical improvement in post-stroke hemiparesis is associated with enlarged primary motor cortex representation. MethodsData were analyzed from a single site subset of the NICHE trial. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) motor mapping was performed in 23 participants (3-12 months post-stroke, 10 female, 40-88 yrs, baseline Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE) range 13-58) before and after intervention. TMS motor maps were acquired for the extensor digitorum communis muscle (EDC) bilaterally, at 110% resting motor threshold (RMT). ResultsImprovement on the primary outcome measure (FM-UE) was statistically and clinically significant (mean pre= 38({+/-}15), post= 45({+/-}16); p <0.001; n=23). Significant improvement was also observed on secondary impairment and activity outcome measures (p<0.05). Ipsilesional hemisphere RMT and map volume (MV) remained unchanged (RMT pre = 42({+/-}13), post = 41({+/-}11), p=0.60; MV pre =77.98({+/-}71.37) mV*mm2, post =109.54({+/-}139.06) mV*mm2, p=0.36). The magnitude of clinical benefit was unrelated to difference in map characteristics from pre to post (Spearmans rho= 0.06, p=0.79). ConclusionsIntervention-related clinical improvement of the upper limb 3-12 months following stroke, was not associated with change in motor cortex excitability or increase in motor maps. Clinical improvements may not solely rely on consistent changes in the cortical motor representation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.