Interactive Learning with ChatGPT: Hands-On Practice and Real-Time Feedback in Health Sciences Education for SMART Goal Writing
Speer, J. E.; Parker, S. M.; Williams, B. L.
Show abstract
Physical therapy (PT) students often fail to master documentation skills, such as goal writing, because they struggle to engage in the material early in the curriculum. Therefore, we sought to leverage ChatGPT to create an active learning experience with personalized feedback and hands-on practice. During the activity, students (n=48) learned to use ChatGPT and employed these techniques to learn about goal writing in PT and the SMART (Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant, Time-bound) framework. Next, students engaged in a clarifying lecture before using ChatGPT to generate scenarios for which they drafted or edited SMART goals and asked ChatGPT for feedback. Pre-tests and post-tests were used to measure the impacts of the experience and to capture student perspectives. As a function of the activity, students were better able to recognize the purposes of SMART goals (p<0.0001) and write better goals (p<0.0001). They also showed increased confidence in their abilities (p<0.0001). Furthermore, student responses suggested that they enjoyed the activity (m=3.5/4) and found it helpful (m=3.7/4). Following the activity, 27 students continued to use ChatGPT to practice or study. This activity represents a novel approach for using generative artificial intelligence (AI) in the classroom to help students actively explore the topic of goal writing. Additionally, this modeled responsible use of AI for health care applications. This well-received activity can be easily scaled to include more complex tasks or group discussions, or adapted for use as an asynchronous assignment related to documentation or topics across health science education.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Instruction for Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Physician Associate Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study 94%
- Training Doctoral Students in Critical Thinking and Experimental Design using Problem-based Learning 93%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Using a design-based research approach to develop a technology-supported physical education course to increase the physical activity levels of university students: Study protocol paper 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 90%
- Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening practices among clinicians practicing in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A mixed methods study 89%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and Formative Evaluation of a Voice-based Virtual Coach for Problem-Solving Treatment 95%
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 92%
- Improving emergency department patient-doctor conversation through an artificial intelligence symptom taking tool: an action-oriented design pilot study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 93%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 91%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.