Solitary Lung Cavities on CT Imaging: Differentiating Malignant and Non-Malignant Diseases
COSGUN, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis study aims to explore how radiological findings contribute to distinguishing between benign and malignant diseases in patients with solitary cavitary lesions detected on CT. MethodsWe retrospectively assessed lesion size, cavity wall thickness, and additional parenchymal findings in diagnosing benign or malignant disease in these patients. Our study investigated the incidence and etiology of solitary pulmonary cavities. CT scans were reviewed by a single radiologist with expertise in thoracic radiology. The study was conducted using two 64-multidetector CT systems, and measurements of lesion size and cavity wall thickness were recorded on axial images. Consolidation and centrilobular nodules were assessed based on predefined criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to determine optimal cut-off points for distinguishing between malignant and non-malignant lesions based on cavity wall thickness. ResultsNon-malignant lesions accounted for 47.9% of cases, with active pulmonary tuberculosis being the most common diagnosis. In the malignant group, primary lung cancer predominated, squamous cell carcinoma being the most prevalent subtypes. Significant differences were noted between malignant and non-malignant cases regarding average maximum wall thickness and lesion diameter. Presence of perilesional consolidation or centrilobular nodules favored non-malignant diagnoses. Maximum wall thickness thresholds of 7.2 mm or 23 mm were most accurate in suggesting non-malignant and malignant etiologies, respectively. ConclusionsIn conclusion, CT findings revealed significant distinctions between malignant and non-malignant solitary lung cavities; benign lesions generally exhibited smaller and thinner cavity walls, with accompanying perilesional parenchymal findings observed in benign lesions of infectious origin but not in malignant lesions.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan 96%
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting False Negative IGRA Results in Pulmonary Tuberculosis Patients Using Propensity Score Matching 94%
- A case-control study evaluating CT signs of xiphoid process associated with xiphodynia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inflammatory profile of induced sputum composition in systemic sclerosis: a comparison with healthy volunteers 92%
- Beneficial influence of single-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of lumbar brucella spondylitis combined with spondylolisthesis 92%
- Immune, metabolic, anatomical, and functional features of people after successful tuberculosis treatment: an exploratory analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated airway quantification associates with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 93%
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 92%
- Observer agreement and clinical significance of chest CT reporting in patients suspected of COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients at risk of pulmonary fibrosis Post Covid-19: Epidemiology, pulmonary sequelaes and humoral response 94%
- AI-based image quality assessment in CT 87%
- Adverse events following COVID-19 virus vaccination in Japanese young population: The first cross-sectional study conducted by a questionnaire survey after the first-time-injection 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 93%
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 91%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.