Back

Characterizing Public Sentiments and Drug Interactions during COVID-19: A Pretrained Language Model and Network Analysis of Social Media Discourse

Li, W.; Hua, Y.; Zhou, P.; Li, Z.; Xu, X.; Yang, J.

2024-06-06 public and global health
10.1101/2024.06.06.24308537 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveHarnessing drug-related data posted on social media in real time can offer insights into how the pandemic impacts drug use and monitor misinformation. This study developed a natural language processing (NLP) pipeline tailored for the analysis of social media discourse on COVID-19 related drugs. MethodsThis study constructed a full pipeline for COVID-19 related drug tweet analysis, utilizing pre-trained language model-based NLP techniques as the backbone. This pipeline is architecturally composed of four core modules: named entity recognition (NER) and normalization to identify medical entities from relevant tweets and standardize them to uniform medication names, target sentiment analysis (TSA) to reveal sentiment polarities associated with the entities, topic modeling to understand underlying themes discussed by the population, and drug network analysis to potential adverse drug reactions (ADR) and drug-drug interactions (DDI). The pipeline was deployed to analyze tweets related to COVID-19 and drug therapies between February 1, 2020, and April 30, 2022. ResultsFrom a dataset comprising 2,124,757 relevant tweets sourced from 1,800,372 unique users, our NER model identified the top five most-discussed drugs: Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Remdesivir, Zinc, and Vitamin D. Sentiment and topic analysis revealed that public perception was predominantly shaped by celebrity endorsements, media hotspots, and governmental directives rather than empirical evidence of drug efficacy. Co-occurrence matrices and complex network analysis further identified emerging patterns of DDI and ADR that could be critical for public health surveillance like better safeguarding public safety in medicines use. ConclusionThis study evidences that an NLP-based pipeline can be a robust tool for large-scale public health monitoring and can offer valuable supplementary data for traditional epidemiological studies concerning DDI and ADR. The framework presented here aspires to serve as a cornerstone for future social media-based public health analytics.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Drug Safety
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
2
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
4
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
6
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
7
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
8
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
10
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
12
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
13
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
14
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
15
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
16
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
18
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.6%
24
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.6%
28
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
29
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
30
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%