Back

A multivariable Mendelian randomisation study of serum lipids and dementia risk within the UK Biobank

Pham, K.; Mulugeta, A.; Lumsden, A.; Hypponen, E.

2024-05-28 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.05.27.24307728 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and aimsAn unfavourable lipid profile has been associated with increased risk of dementia. However, it is challenging to investigate each serum lipid measure individually due to the high correlation between the traits. We tested for genetic evidence supporting associations between serum lipid measures and risk of dementia. MethodsWe conducted multivariable and univariable Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses on 329,896 UK Biobank participants (age 37-73 years) to examine the associations between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides, apolipoprotein-A1 (ApoA1) and apolipoprotein-B (ApoB), and the risk of dementia. The multivariable approach allows us to assess the association of each lipid measure with the outcome, including where the genetic variant-exposure associations are mediated by one another. ResultsIn the univariable MR analyses, we observed no association between genetically determined serum lipids and risk of dementia. However, in a multivariable MR model containing LDL-C, triglycerides, and ApoB, ApoB was associated with a higher risk of dementia (OR per 1 SD higher ApoB 1.63, 95% CI 1.12, 2.37). Multivariable findings were consistent across IVWMR and MR-Egger, but not weighted median MR or MR-Lasso. HDL-C and ApoA1 were not associated with dementia in univariable or multivariable MR. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that when considering the correlation between lipid measures, ApoB may play a role in the previously reported association between serum lipids and increased risk of dementia. Future studies should aim to confirm the findings in clinical/experimental studies and further explore the role of ApoB in dementia pathophysiology.

Published in Alzheimer's & Dementia · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.