Back

Effect of antibacterial mouthwash on NO bioavailability and muscle contractile function in young healthy men and women

Gallardo, E. J.; Zoughaib, W. S.; Singhal, A.; Hoffman, R. L.; Coggan, A. R.

2024-05-21 sports medicine
10.1101/2024.05.21.24307698 medRxiv
Show abstract

The use of antiseptic mouthwash is widespread due to its oral health benefits. However, its impact on systemic physiological processes, particularly nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and muscle contractility, is not fully understood. PURPOSETo determine the effects of cetylpyridinium-based (antibacterial) versus sodium chloride (NaCl) -based (control) mouthwashes on salivary and breath NO markers and muscle contractile function in healthy young adults. METHODSTwenty-six participants (n=13/group) completed a randomized, parallel-arm, blinded trial, comparing the effects of the two mouthwashes before and after 7 d of treatment. NO bioavailability was assessed via measurement of nitrate (NO3-), nitrite (NO2-), and cyclic guanyl monophosphate (cGMP) concentrations in saliva and the level of NO in breath. The contractile function of the knee extensor muscles was determined via isokinetic dynamometry. RESULTSNo significant changes in salivary NO3-, NO2-, or cGMP or in breath NO were observed in response to either treatment. However, cetylpyridinium-based mouthwash reduced the percentage of NO3- in saliva (16.9{+/-}10.5% vs. 24.9{+/-}13.4%; p=0.0036), supporting compliance with the intervention. Peak torque at velocities of 0-6.28 rad/s was unaffected by mouthwash use. Calculated maximal knee extensor velocity (Vmax) and power (Pmax) were therefore also unchanged. CONCLUSIONCetylpyridinium-containing mouthwash inhibits reduction of NO3- to NO2- in the oral cavity but does not significantly diminish overall NO bioavailability or impair muscle contractile function in healthy young men and women. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NumberNCT04095442 (registered 09/19/2019) O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=182 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/24307698v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a06298org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a8fd7borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@999fcforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cad999_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.