Back

The Effect of Perceived Social support on Cervical Cancer Screening among Nepali women residing in Dhulikhel and Banepa municipality

Cruanes, G.; Paudel, P.; Regmi, U.; House, D. R.; Shrestha, A.; Paneru, B.

2024-05-21 public and global health
10.1101/2024.05.21.24307693 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCervical cancer ranks as the most common cancer among Nepalese women with a high incidence and mortality. Despite evidence that effective screening programs reduce disease burden, screening services are under-utilized. In various other countries, perceived social support has been shown to increase cervical cancer screening uptake among women. ObjectivesThis study assessed the association between perceived social support and cervical cancer screening uptake among women residing in semi-urban areas of Kavrepalanchok district (Dhulikhel and Banepa), Nepal. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study among women aged 30-60 years using telephone interview method from 15th June to 15th October 2021. A validated Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) was utilized to measure perceived social support. We obtained information on cervical cancer screening uptake through self-reported responses. A Mann Whitney analysis was performed to assess the association between perceived social support and cervical cancer screening uptake. ResultsFour hundred twenty-six women participated in the study. There was a significant association between significant others social support (p-value=0.007, 95% CI: 0.08-0.53) and family social support (p-value=0.04, 95% CI: 0.003-0.4). ConclusionWomen residing in semi-urban areas of Nepal who had higher perceived social support from their significant other and family were more likely to have been screened for cervical cancer. Community interventions fostering conversations about reproductive health between husbands and their wives may increase perceived social support and contribute to higher uptake of cervical cancer screening.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.