Prognostic Factors for Mortality in Patients Infected with Hantavirus: A Systematic Review with GRADE Certainty Assessment
Tortosa, F.; Neumann, I.; Perre, F.; Ragusa, M. A.; Lossetti, L.; Guaresti, G.; Izcovich, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionOne of the challenges in managing patients with hantavirus infection is accurately identifying individuals who are at risk of developing severe disease. Prompt identification of these patients can facilitate critical decisions, such as early referral to an intensive care unit. The identified prognostic factors could be incorporated into predictive models to enhance the management of hantavirus infection. ObjectiveTo identify and evaluate prognostic factors associated with mortality in hantavirus infection, providing a basis for a risk assessment model for hantavirus mortality MethodsWe conducted a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Embase from their inception to January 2024. Furthermore, we included studies evaluating individual prognostic factors or risk assessment models of hantavirus infections, with no restrictions on study design, publication status, or language. When feasible, we conducted meta-analyses for prognostic factors using the inverse variance-based method with random effect model. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach, ResultsWe included 30 studies with a total of 92,183 participants. We identified the following key prognostic factors which predicted and increased mortality and disease severity: over 15 years, female gender, elevated creatinine levels (>1.4 mg/dL), increased hematocrit (>42%), and presence of infiltrates on chest radiographs. DiscussionOur systematic review not only sheds light on the pivotal prognostic factors for hantavirus infection but also sets the stage for the development of comprehensive management strategies that are informed by robust empirical evidence. These strategies, underpinned by predictive modeling and regional customization, can significantly enhance outcomes for individuals at risk of severe hantavirus disease, aligning with global health objectives aimed at zoonotic disease control and prevention. PROSPERO Registration NumberCRD42021225823
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 95%
- Factors Associated with Disease Severity and Mortality among Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 94%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: An Overview of Systematic Reviews 93%
- Guidelines on reporting and assessing mathematical models for infectious disease dynamics: A scoping review 92%
- Explanation of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease Cases in Japan Using Google Trends Before and During the COVID-19: Infodemiology Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The relative infectiousness of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infected persons compared with symptomatic individuals: A rapid scoping review. 93%
- Favipiravir for treating novel coronavirus (COVID-19) patients: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials 92%
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Serological and viral prevalence of Oropouche virus (OROV): A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2000-2024 including human, animal, and vector surveillance studies 94%
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the potential non-human animal reservoirs and arthropod vectors of the Mayaro virus 94%
- A systematic review of the clinical profile of patients with bubonic plague and the outcome measures used in research settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in secondary attack rates based on symptom status of index case(s)– a living systematic review 93%
- Review and methodological analysis of trials currently testing treatment and prevention options for the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) globally. 93%
- Hydroxychloroquine and mortality risk of patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of human comparative studies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.