Back

Construction of a breast cancer predictive nomogram based on diverse cell death methods and reveal tumor microenvironment characterization

Wu, R.; Wang, Z.; Dong, C.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.

2024-05-14 cancer biology
10.1101/2024.05.09.593462 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo develop a robust predictive model and nomogram for breast cancer (BC) linked to genes associated with diverse cell death methods. MethodsThe prognostic model was constructed using the LASSO Cox method. Model performance was assessed using K-M analysis, ROC curves, and independent prognostic analysis. Subsequently, we constructed a nomogram and analyzed differences in tumor microenvironment and drug sensitivity between different subgroups. The enrichment of differentially expressed genes between different subgroups was assessed. Additionally, we overexpressed CD24 in BC cell lines to assess its impact on cellular proliferation using CCK8 assays, migration through scratch and transwell assays, and apoptosis via flow cytometry. ResultsA prognostic model comprising twelve genes (CREB3L1, SFRP1, SHARPIN, AIFM1, IL-18, CD24, EDA2R, CRIP1, XBP1, BCL2A1, NKX3-1, and NME5) was constructed. BC patients were categorized into different subgroups, with the low-risk subgroup demonstrating superior survival. Additionally, we constructed a nomogram. The nomogram was validated as a reliable independent predictor of outcome. The enrichment analyses imply a connection between patient risk and immune response. The low-risk subgroup had a higher TME score. Patients in the high-risk group had improved responses to lapatinib, BI-2536, OSI-027, and SB505124, while those in the low-risk subgroup showed improved sensitivity to axitinib, epirubicin, fulvestrant, and olaparib. Furthermore, CD24 overexpression was found to promote proliferation and migration, while inhibiting apoptosis. ConclusionThese findings contribute to the individualization of treatment and aid in uncovering the tumor microenvironment characterization for BC patients.

Published in Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.0%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.6%
6
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
10
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
13
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
Theranostics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
23
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%