Back

Functional and multi-omic aging rejuvenation with GLP-1R agonism

Huang, J.; Kwok, A. J.; Li, J. C. Y.; Chiu, C. L. H.; Ip, B. Y. M.; Tung, L. Y.; Zheng, X.; Chow, H. T.; Lo, M. P. S.; Li, Z.; Chan, R. C. H.; Lin, N.; Wang, Z.; Wang, M.; Yan, L. Y. C.; Chan, D. C. W.; Wu, W. K. K.; Chow, H.-M.; Lin, W.-J.; Tang, Y.; Ng, B. W.-L.; Wong, S. H.; Leung, T. W.; Mok, V. C. T.; Ko, H.

2024-05-08 systems biology
10.1101/2024.05.06.592653 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying readily implementable methods that can effectively counteract aging is urgently needed for tackling age-related degenerative disorders. Here, we conducted functional assessments and deep molecular phenotyping in the aging mouse to demonstrate that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) treatment attenuates body-wide age-related changes. Apart from improvements in physical and cognitive performance, the age-counteracting effects are prominently evident at multiple omic levels. These span the transcriptomes and DNA methylomes of various tissues, organs and circulating white blood cells, as well as the plasma metabolome. Importantly, the beneficial effects are specific to aged mice, not young adults, and are achieved with a low dosage of GLP-1RA which has a negligible impact on food consumption and body weight. The molecular rejuvenation effects exhibit organ-specific characteristics, which are generally heavily dependent on hypothalamic GLP-1R. We benchmarked the GLP-1RA age-counteracting effects against those of mTOR inhibition, a well-established anti-aging intervention, observing a strong resemblance across the two strategies. Our findings have broad implications for understanding the mechanistic basis of the clinically observed pleiotropic effects of GLP-1RAs, the design of intervention trials for age-related diseases, and the development of anti-aging-based therapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.