Using Generative AI to Simulate Patient History-Taking in a Problem-Based Learning Tutorial: A Mixed-Methods Study
Mool, A.; Schmid, J.; Johnston, T.; Thomas, W.; Fenner, E.; Lu, K.; Gandhi, R.; Western, A.; Seabold, B.; Smith, K.; Patterson, Z.; Feldt, H.; Vollmer, D.; Nallaveettil, R.; Fanelli, A.; Schmillen, L.; Tischkau, S.; Cianciolo, A. T.; Benedict, P.; Selinfreund, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundMedical educators who implement problem-based learning (PBL) strive to balance realism and feasibility when simulating patient cases, aiming to stimulate collaborative group discussion, engage students clinical reasoning, motivate self-directed learning, and promote the development of actionable scientific understanding. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) offer exciting new potential for patient simulation in PBL MethodThis study used a between-groups, mixed-methods approach to (1) form a comprehensive picture of Year 2 medical student interactions with a generative AI-simulated patient in a PBL tutorial, as compared to interactions with multimedia patient case materials; and (2) triangulate on the impact these interactions had on learning. Two groups of students (N = 13) gathered patient history information from a generative AI-enabled, 3D-animated avatar (AI condition). Two other student groups (N = 13) gathered patient history information from a multimedia database using keyword searching (Electronic PBL Module [ePBLM] condition). We used descriptive observation to explore student interactions with both forms of the simulated patient, and we quantitatively compared students perceptions of their learning experience and recall of patient history information across conditions. ResultsStudents in the AI condition rated their present, AI-augmented PBL learning experience--particularly its clinical accuracy and teamwork aspects--significantly higher than they rated their previous PBL learning experiences using ePBLMs. Recall of patient history information did not differ between conditions. Descriptive observation indicated that the AI avatar presented case content accurately, with an appropriate amount of information provided in response to students questions. Students were highly engaged as a group in taking a history from the avatar. However, although students used language suggestive of anthropomorphizing of the AI (e.g., gender pronouns), they appeared to orient to it as an augmented "question bank" for gathering patient history information, using a questioning strategy akin to querying an ePBLM. DiscussionOptimizing AI implementation to stimulate clinical reasoning and patient communication skills in PBL could include (1) starting early, perhaps in Year 1, before an alternative interactional framework can take hold; (2) orienting students to the AI to help them understand its capabilities; and (3) encouraging "play" with or "discovery learning" of the AIs capabilities.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Training Doctoral Students in Critical Thinking and Experimental Design using Problem-based Learning 96%
- Team-Based Learning Versus Lecture-Based Instruction for Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Physician Associate Education: A Quasi-Experimental Study 95%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biology exams rarely use visual models to engage higher-order cognitive skills 95%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote Learning Barriers and Opportunities for Graduate Student and Postdoctoral Learners in Career and Professional Skill Development: A Case Study 95%
- Preprint peer review enhances undergraduate biology students' disciplinary literacy and sense of belonging in STEM 95%
- Flying in the Face of Adversity: A Drosophila-based Virtual CURE Provides Semester-long Authentic Research Opportunity to the Flipped Classroom. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 91%
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 91%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 92%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 88%
- An Experimental Test of the Effects of Redacting Grant Applicant Identifiers on Peer Review Outcomes 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.