DNA methylation in pituitary adenomas: scoping review protocol
Moeller, M. W.; Nortvig, M. J.; Andersen, M. S.; Poulsen, F. R.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe general objective of this study is to map the current knowledge in DNA methylation in Pituitary Adenomas, and in particular focus on genetic and epigenetic findings and the translation into a clinical setting. IntroductionPituitary tumorigenesis is currently under major investigation. The current research has turned to epigenomic analysis, investigating whether several epigenetic components like DNA methylation and histone modification can be used as markers for tumorigenesis. Several studies report genes involved in relation to hypo/hypermethylated sites. Others describe differential methylated probes/regions (DMR or DMP) and show subclassification traits. Furthermore, most recent studies aim to cluster samples based on full methylome data (unsupervised cluster analysis), while others chose to assess the most different probes (example 2000 probes) and perform the same data-analysis. Inclusion criteriaIn this review, we will include all primary studies on pituitary adenomas analyzed by DNA methylation. No review studies will be included. All papers describing DNA methylation in pituitary adenomas in humans will be included. In addition, all languages will be included. However, both title and abstract needs to be written in English. MethodsPapers will be identified via systematic search using the bibliographic databases: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Scopus. Two reviewers will screen all papers based on title and abstract. All relevant papers will be included for further assessment by the same two reviewers. Full texts from each selected paper will be read, and if relevant regarding the eligibility criteria, papers will be included in the review. Disputes between these reviewers, the paper/papers will be discussed in the entire research-group. 5. FundingNo external funding for this review, funded by in-house resources.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha thalassemia/mental retardation X-linked (ATRX) protein expression in human pituitary neuroendocrine tumours and its reported correlation to prognosis and clinical outcomes: A systematic review 93%
- Sources of variation and establishment of Russian reference intervals for major hormones and tumor markers 88%
- Cortisol levels adter cold exposure are independent of adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temozolomide sensitivity of malignant glioma cell lines – a systematic review assessing consistencies between in vitro studies 86%
- Connecting Patterns of Tumor Growth with Sex Differences in Extreme Survivorship for Primary Glioblastoma Patients 86%
- GDNF-RET signaling and EGR1 form a positive feedback loop that promotes tamoxifen resistance via cyclin D1 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain Dopamine Receptor System is Not Altered in Obesity: Bayesian and Frequentist Meta-Analyses 86%
- The spectral slope as a marker of excitation/inhibition ratio and cognitive functioning in multiple sclerosis 84%
- Women's brain aging: effects of sex-hormone exposure, pregnancies, and genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid DNA methylation-based classification of pediatric brain tumours from ultrasonic aspirate specimens 85%
- Association of Extent of Resection and Functional Outcomes in Diffuse Low-Grade Glioma: Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis 85%
- Predictors of postoperative biochemical remission in acromegaly 84%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic disorders and the risk of head and neck cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 87%
- The German Gestational Diabetes Study (PREG): Rationale, Methodology and Design 86%
- Early School Years follow up of the Asking Questions in Alcohol Longitudinal Study in Melbourne, Australia ( AQUA at 6 ): Cohort profile 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.