Back

Mapping the Brazilian Scientific Diaspora: Migration Patterns of PhDs in Global Mobility

McManus, C.; Neto, B. A. D.; Neves, A. A. B.; Schleicher, R. T.; Figueiredo, C. P.

2024-04-22 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2024.04.22.590567 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A scientific diaspora refers to a community of scientists who have emigrated from their home country to work in another nation. This study investigates this phenome in depth the Brazilian context, examining who comprises this diaspora (doctorates, postdocs, lecturers), where they have migrated, and their areas of study. We conducted this examination based on publications by Brazilian doctors who graduated between 2005 and 2021, as well as post-doctorates and students with full doctorate scholarships abroad. These students were identified on the CAPES open data website. The publications of these authors were captured in Scopus and Web of Science. Then those with addresses abroad were analysed in Vosviewer(R) and using logistic regression (stayed abroad or not), area of knowledge and a decision tree to see the effect of the Brazilian university region, type of institution and scholarship on the decision to migrate. The level of diaspora is approximately 1.7% among all doctorates trained in Brazil, reaching 6.6% in postdoctoral scholars with experience abroad. This suggests that PhDs with advanced training and experience have a higher propensity to emigrate from Brazil. These PhDs predominantly choose to migrate to North America and Western Europe, with a strong preference for careers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields. Brazilian PhDs with international experience tend to have a more diverse migration pattern, while those who complete their PhD in Brazil show a distinct preference for migrating to Portugal, indicating differing global mobility based on scientific experience. A decision tree analysis reveals that life or exact sciences PhDs, those who graduated after 2012, and obtained their postgraduate degrees from institutions in the southeast or south of Brazil are more likely to migrate. While the reasons behind these migration patterns are not evaluated in this study, better job prospects, higher salaries, or more substantial research funding could be influential factors in the decision to migrate.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
26.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.4%
3
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
8
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
10
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.5%
16
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
17
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%