Cognitive training reshapes functional lateralization of fronto-parietal network in patients with vascular cognitive impairment no dementia
Jin, X.; Xing, Y.; Lv, B.; Wang, X.; Tang, Y.; Du, Y.
Show abstract
Background and ObjectivesVascular cognitive impairment no dementia represents cognitive deficits due to vascular causes but falls short of a dementia diagnosis. Cognitive training has emerged as a safe and effective intervention for vascular cognitive impairment no dementia, though its underlying mechanisms remain obscure. This study investigates how subcortical vascular cognitive impairment no dementia and computerized cognitive training affect a brain fundamental organization feature named functional lateralization. MethodsIn a randomized, active-controlled trial, patients with subcortical vascular cognitive impairment no dementia were divided into training and control groups, and underwent neuropsychological assessments and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging at baseline, end of 7-week intervention, and 6-month follow-up. Additionally, a healthy older group provided baseline data. Two types of functional lateralization indices (LIs) were defined based on resting-state functional connectivity: LI of intrahemispheric functional connectivity (LI_intra) which represents the left-right difference of functional connectivity strength within the same hemisphere, and LI of interhemispheric heterotopic functional connectivity (LI_he) which represents the left-right difference of functional connectivity strength across bilateral hemispheres. ResultsInitially, patients (28 in training group and 28 in control group) showed a fronto-parietal network lateralization pattern akin to healthy older adults (N = 26). However, enhanced right-lateralized LI_he was associated with better memory solely in healthy adults. After the intervention, only the training group exhibited a reduction in LI_he in the fronto-parietal network, indicating a lateralization shift towards bilateral network connectivity. This shift, especially towards leftward lateralization, was linked with improved executive and memory functions in the training group. Notably, these changes disappeared at the 6-month follow-up. DiscussionThese findings suggest that subcortical vascular cognitive impairment no dementia modifies the relationship between fronto-parietal network lateralization and cognitive function, rather than altering the lateralization pattern itself. Through hemispherical reorganizing and balancing of the fronto-parietal network, short-term computerized cognitive training facilitates executive and memory functions by leveraging functional compensation by reorganization. This study illuminates the neural plasticity induced by cognitive training in vascular cognitive impairment no dementia, highlighting its potential to transform cognitive outcomes by tapping into the brains capacity for reorganization and adaptation. Trial registrationThe trial was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02640716) and conducted under both CONSORT statement and CONSORT statement for nonpharmacological interventions.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential effects of aging, Alzheimer's pathology, and APOE4 on longitudinal functional connectivity and episodic memory in older adults 96%
- Age-related differences in Rostral-Middle Locus Coeruleus Microstructure: A Critical Role in Cognitive Decline Revealed by Magnetic Resonance Relaxometry 93%
- Higher levels of myelin are associated with higher resistance against tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Relationship between topological efficiency of white matter structural connectome and plasma biomarkers across Alzheimer’s disease continuum 94%
- Interregional causal influences of brain metabolic activity reveal the spread of aging effects during normal aging 93%
- The relevance of rich club regions for functional outcome post-stroke is enhanced in women 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.