Sedation practices in patients intubated in the emergency department compared to the intensive care unit.
Sereeyotin, J.; Yarnell, C.; Mehta, S.
Show abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to compare sedation management during and after intubation in the emergency department (ED) versus the intensive care unit (ICU). MethodsThis was a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults intubated in the ED or in the ICU and received mechanical ventilation between January 2018 and February 2022. We collected data from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was duration from intubation to first documentation of light sedation, defined as a Sedation Agitation Scale score (SAS) of 3-4. ResultsThe study included 264 patients, with 95 (36%) intubated in the ED and 169 (64%) in the ICU. Regarding anesthetic agents used for intubation, ketamine was the most commonly used drug in the ED and was used more frequently than in the ICU (61% vs 40%, p=0.001). Propofol was the predominant sedative used in the ICU, with a higher prevalence compared to the ED (50% vs 33%, p=0.01). Additionally, benzodiazepines and fentanyl were more frequently used in the ICU (39% vs 6%, p<0.001 and 68% vs 9.5%, p<0.001, respectively). Within 24 hours after intubation, 68% (65/95) ED patients and 82% (138/169) patients intubated in ICU achieved light sedation, with median durations of 13.5 hours and 10.5 hours. Patient location in the ED at intubation was associated with decreased probability of achieving light sedation at 24 hours (adjusted odds ratio 0.64, p=0.04). ConclusionCritically ill patients intubated in the ED are at risk of deeper sedation and a longer time to achieve light sedation compared to patients intubated in the ICU.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate combined with propofol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial 94%
- Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: a physiology-based approach 94%
- Nasogastric tube in critical care setting: combining ETCO2 and pH measuring to confirm correct placement 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 95%
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 91%
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early Tocilizumab Dosing is Associated with Improved Survival In Critically Ill Patients Infected With Sars-CoV-2 91%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 91%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Increase in ventilatory ratio indicates progressive alveolar damage and suggests poor prognosis in severe COVID-19: A single-center retrospective observational study 91%
- Sepsis Subphenotyping Based on Organ Dysfunction Trajectory 91%
- Secondary pneumonia in critically ill ventilated patients with COVID-19 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.