Have AI-Generated Texts from LLM Infiltrated the Realm of Scientific Writing? A Large-Scale Analysis of Preprint Platforms
Cheng, H.; Sheng, B.; Lee, A.; Chaudhary, V.; Atanasov, A. G.; Liu, N.; Qiu, Y.; Wong, T. Y.; Tham, Y.-C.; Zheng, Y.-F.
10.1101/2024.03.25.586710 bioRxivShow abstract
Since the release of ChatGPT in 2022, AI-generated texts have inevitably permeated various types of writing, sparking debates about the quality and quantity of content produced by such large language models (LLM). This study investigates a critical question: Have AI-generated texts from LLM infiltrated the realm of scientific writing, and if so, to what extent and in what setting? By analyzing a dataset comprised of preprint manuscripts uploaded to arXiv, bioRxiv, and medRxiv over the past two years, we confirmed and quantified the widespread influence of AI-generated texts in scientific publications using the latest LLM-text detection technique, the Binoculars LLM-detector. Further analyses with this tool reveal that: (1) the AI influence correlates with the trend of ChatGPT web searches; (2) it is widespread across many scientific domains but exhibits distinct impacts within them (highest: computer science, engineering sciences); (3) the influence varies with authors who have different language speaking backgrounds and geographic regions according to the location of their affiliations (Italy, China, etc.); (4) AI-generated texts are used in various content types in manuscripts (most significant: hypothesis formulation, conclusion summarization); (5) AI usage has a positive influence on papers impact, measured by its citation numbers. Based on these findings, suggestions about the advantages and regulation of AI-augmented scientific writing are discussed.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.