Back

Detecting microbiome species unique or enriched in 20+ cancer types and building cancer microbiome heterogeneity networks

Ma, Z.; Li, L.; Mei, J.

2024-03-24 oncology
10.1101/2024.03.23.24304768
Show abstract

It is postulated that tumor tissue microbiome is one of the enabling characteristics that either promote or suppress cancer cells and tumors to acquire certain hallmarks (functional traits) of cancers, which highlights their critical importance to carcinogenesis, cancer progression and therapy responses. However, characterizing the tumor microbiomes is extremely challenging because of their low biomass and severe difficulties in controlling laboratory-borne contaminants, which is further aggravated by lack of comprehensively effective computational approaches to identify unique or enriched microbial species associated with cancers. Here we take advantages of two recent computational advances, one by Poore et al (2020, Nature) that computationally generated the microbiome datasets of 33 cancer types [of 10481 patients, including primary tumor (PT), solid normal tissue (NT), and blood samples] from whole-genome and whole-transcriptome data deposited in "The Cancer Genome Atlas" (TCGA), another termed "specificity diversity framework" (SDF) developed recently by Ma (2023). By reanalyzing Poores datasets with the SDF framework, further augmented with complex network analysis, we produced the following catalogues of microbial species (archaea, bacteria and viruses) with statistical rigor including unique species (USs) and enriched species (ESs) in PT, NT, or blood tissues. We further reconstructed species specificity network (SSN) and cancer microbiome heterogeneity network (CHN) to identify core/periphery network structures, from which we gain insights on the codependency of microbial species distribution on landscape of cancer types, which seems to suggest that the codependency appears to be universal across all cancer types.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
11.2%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 11%
7.6%
3
Briefings in Bioinformatics
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 24%
7.6%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 3%
4.5%
6
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 0.6%
4.5%
7
mSystems
based on 16 papers
Top 0.5%
3.0%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 9%
2.8%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
2.8%
12
Cell Reports
based on 25 papers
Top 0.3%
2.8%
13
Communications Biology
based on 36 papers
Top 0.7%
2.4%
14
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.4%
15
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
16
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 88%
1.8%
17
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
18
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 0.9%
1.6%
19
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
based on 39 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Clinical and Translational Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.3%
23
EMBO Molecular Medicine
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Genetics
based on 32 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
25
Gut Microbes
based on 15 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
27
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
28
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
30
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 14%
0.7%