Back

Identification and characterization of neoantigen-reactive CD8+ T cells following checkpoint blockade therapy in a pan-cancer setting

Moss, K. H.; Hansen, U. K.; De Lima, V. A. B.; Borch, A.; Marquez, E. S.; Bjerregaard, A.-m.; Oestrup, O.; Bentzen, A. K.; Marquard, A. M.; Kadivar, M.; Svane, I. M.; Lassen, U.; Hadrup, S. R.

2024-03-17 immunology
10.1101/2024.03.17.585416 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundImmune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has been approved as first-line or second-line therapies for an expanding list of malignancies. T cells recognizing mutation-derived neoantigens are hypothesized to play a major role in tumor elimination. However, the dynamics and characteristics of such neoantigen-reactive T cells (NARTs) in the context of ICB are still limitedly understood. MethodsTo explore this, tumor biopsies and peripheral blood were obtained pre- and post-treatment from 20 patients with solid metastatic tumors, in a Phase I basket trial. From whole-exome sequencing and RNA-seq data, patient-specific libraries of neopeptides were predicted and screened with DNA barcode-labeled MHC multimers for CD8+ T cell reactivity, in conjunction with the evaluation of T cell phenotype. ResultsWe were able to detect NARTs in the peripheral blood and tumor biopsies for the majority of the patients; however, we did not observe any significant difference between the disease control and progressive disease patient groups, in terms of the breadth and magnitude of the detected NARTs. We also observed that the hydrophobicity of the peptide played a role in defining neopeptides resulting in NARTs response. A trend towards a treatment-induced phenotype signature was observed in the NARTs post-treatment, with the appearance of Ki67+ CD27+ PD-1+ subsets in the PBMCs and CD39+ Ki67+ TCF-1+ subsets in the TILs. Finally, the estimation of T cells from RNAseq was increasing post versus pre-treatment for disease control patients. ConclusionOur data demonstrates the possibility of monitoring the characteristics of NARTs from tumor biopsies and peripheral blood, and that such characteristics could potentially be incorporated with other immune predictors to understand further the complexity governing clinical success for ICB therapy.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.7%
2
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.6%
4
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
9
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
11
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 40%
1.8%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.3%
13
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
16
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Cell Communication and Signaling
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
24
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Cell & Bioscience
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
27
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%