Estimating the selection pressure of tumor growth on tumor tissue microbiomes
Li, L.; Ma, Z.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe relationships between tumor and its microbiome are still puzzling, with possible bidirectional interactions. Tumor microbiomes may suppress or stimulate tumor growth on the one hand; on the other hand, tumor growth may exert selection pressure on its microbiomes. There is not any consensus on the mode and/or extension of the bidirectional interactions. The objective of this study is to estimate the selection pressure from the primary tumors on tumor microbiomes by comparing with the selection pressure from the solid normal tissues on their corresponding tissue microbiomes across 20+ cancer types. MethodsWe apply Sloan near neutral theory and big datasets of tumor tissue microbiomes from the TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas) databases to achieve the above objective. The near neutral theory model can determine the proportions of above-neutral, neutral and below-neutral species in microbial communities, corresponding with positive, neutral and negative selection pressures from host tissues. By comparing the proportions between the primary tumors and solid normal tissues, we can infer the selection pressure of tumor growth on tissue microbiomes. ResultsWe find that approximately 65% of species in solid normal tissue microbiomes are neutral, and the proportion is only 40% in the primary tumor microbiomes. In contrast, the proportion of positively selected species exceeds 60% in the primary tumor microbiomes. Furthermore, simulations with neutral theory model reveal that most abundant species are mostly neutral, while non-neutral species are in the long tail of the species abundance distributions. ConclusionsTumor growth exerts strong positive selection on resident microbiomes, driving the abundances of certain species above the levels expected by the neutral process. Nevertheless, neutral species are still among the most abundant species, suggesting the necessity to pay close attention to the low-abundance or rare species because they are likely to play a critical role in oncogenesis.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling the temporal dynamics of the gut microbial community in adults and infants 94%
- Individualized network analysis reveals a link between the gut microbiome, diet intervention and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus 94%
- Revisiting the invasion paradox: resistance-richness relationship is driven by augmentation and displacement trends 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-analysis of Microbiome Association Networks Reveal Patterns of Dysbiosis in Diseased Microbiomes 94%
- Comparison of the effectiveness of different normalization methods for metagenomic cross-study phenotype prediction under heterogeneity 94%
- Survivability and Life Support in Sealed Mini-Ecosystems with Simulated Planetary Soils 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.