The costs and cost-effectiveness of different service models of palliative care, focusing on end of life care: A rapid review
Spencer, L. H.; Anthony, B. F.; Davies, J.; Pisavadia, K.; Gillen, E.; Noyes, J.; Fitzsimmons, D.; Lewis, R.; Cooper, A.; Hughes, D.; Edwards, R. T.; Edwards, A.
Show abstract
Some people receive palliative or end of life care at home, others in hospitals or hospices, or a combination of home and hospice/home and hospital models. This rapid review aims to determine the costs and cost-effectiveness of different service models of palliative care or end of life care. These studies are mostly conducted from the perspective of the healthcare system, disregarding costs related to patients/caregivers economic burden (Perea-Bello et al., 2023). Research Implications and Evidence GapsMore UK research is needed on cost impacts of new services such as Enhanced Supported Care (ESC). Future research should consider which methods are most appropriate to evaluate palliative care models. Standard methodology, such as the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), may not be most appropriate for this end of life population. Improving QALYs may not be the intended aim of palliative care or end of life interventions, and prolonging death may be inconsistent with patient preferences and wishes. The quality and applicability of the evidence we found in our rapid review were variable, and therefore, uncertainty remains, especially when the perspective of analysis was not stated clearly. Therefore, it was difficult to ascertain whether all relevant costs were considered. Assumptions on costs were not varied in many studies, and most studies had different time horizons. Policy and Practice ImplicationsThis rapid review has shown that hospital-based palliative care costs are higher than hospice or home-based palliative care. This suggests that home-based palliative care should be available to all patients in a recognisable end of life phase who desire to remain and die at home. Healthcare planners should aim to reduce hospitalisation at the end of life but only if access to quality home care at the end of life is guaranteed. Patients should have a choice about where they prefer to die without moving the costs from the healthcare system to the home caregivers, rendering the costs invisible. Funding StatementThe Bangor Institute for Medical and Health Research, was funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 91%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 91%
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling Palliative and End of Life resource requirements during COVID-19: implications for quality care 92%
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 91%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Models, components, and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic review of reviews 92%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 92%
- Addressing barriers to interprofessional working with homecare workers in community palliative care: insights from a multi-site qualitative case study in England 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia’s universal health care system: a national linked data study 89%
- Staff experiences and perspectives of delivering an integrated child health and social care service in community settings: A qualitative exploration using the SELFIE framework 87%
- A novel methodology to measure waiting times for community-based specialist care in a public healthcare system 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness of intensive care for hospitalized Covid-19 patients: experience from South Africa 90%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 89%
- ‘Leading from the front’ implementation strategies increase the success of influenza vaccination drives among healthcare workers: A reanalysis of Systematic Review evidence using Intervention Component Analysis (ICA) and Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.