Back

Significance of Right Ventricular Myocardial Work for Clinical Improvement in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Patients after Transcatheter Edge-To-Edge Repair

Zeng, J.; Shu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Lu, C.; Xu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Ye, L.; Meng, Q.; Wang, S.; Yao, Y.; Lin, X.; WANG, Y.

2024-03-04 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.03.01.24303636
Show abstract

AimsIt remains uncertain which patients would benefit the most from transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). We aim to investigate the relationship between right ventricular function, as assessed by pressure-strain loops (PSL), and post-TEER clinical improvement. Methods and resultsA total of 48 heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients (68{+/-}15 yrs) with moderate-to-severe or severe SMR were enrolled for TEER. Impaired health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score [KCCQ-OS]) and exercise capacity (6-min walk distance [6MWD]) were evaluated at baseline and during 1-year follow up. Before and right after TEER, myocardial work (MW) metrics were non-invasively evaluated, including global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE). RV GLS, RVGWI, RVGCW, RVGWE were significantly increased after MitraClip treatment (-9.7{+/-}3.8%, 452.4{+/-}112.5 mmHg%, 596.3{+/-}127.5 mmHg% and 85.7{+/-}15.6% before vs -12.5{+/-}3.5%, 589.4{+/-}119.6 mmHg%, 778.8{+/-}135.3 mmHg% and 91.2{+/-}22.4% after MitraClip treatment, p = 0.025, 0.030, 0.025 and 0.037, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier estimates for survival, freedom from HF hospitalization at 12 months were 95.8% and 89.1%. On multivariable linear regression analysis, RVGWI and RVGCW immediate change was independently associated with KCCQ-OS ({bigtriangleup}RVGWI: {beta} = 0.40, P < 0.001; {bigtriangleup}RVGCW: {beta} = 0.39, P =0.003), RVGWI, RVGCW and RVGLS immediate change were independently associated with 6MWD improvement ({bigtriangleup}RVGWI: {beta} = 0.31, P = 0.029; {bigtriangleup}RVGCW: {beta} = 0.30, P = 0.039; {bigtriangleup}RVGLS: {beta} = 0.35, P = 0.041). ConclusionRVMW was significantly increased after MitraClip treatment. And RV reserve function is an important predictor of clinical improvement in HFrEF patients with TEER.

Matching journals

1
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 0.4%
37× avg
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 1%
17× avg
3
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
#1
172× avg
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.3%
51× avg
5
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 67%
5.3%
6
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 39%
4.7%
7
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.3%
45× avg
8
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 0.7%
44× avg
9
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
10
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
17× avg
11
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
12
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
12× avg
13
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
28× avg
14
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 12 published papers
Top 0.8%
33× avg
15
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 4%
5.9× avg
16
Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 4%
5.0× avg
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
MDPI AG · based on 77 published papers
Top 12%
2.3× avg
18
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
9.3× avg
19
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
Top 3%
7.8× avg