Making Biological Ageing Clocks Personal
Pusparum, M.; Thas, O.; Beck, S.; Ertaylan, G.; Ecker, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundAge is the most important risk factor for the majority of human diseases. Addressing the impact of age-related diseases has become a priority in healthcare practice, leading to the exploration of innovative approaches, including the development of predictors to estimate biological age (so-called "ageing clocks"). These predictors offer promising insights into the ageing process and age-related diseases. This study aims to showcase the significance of ageing clocks within a unique, deeply phenotyped longitudinal cohort. By utilising omics-based approaches alongside gold-standard clinical risk predictors, we elucidate the potential of these novel predictors in revolutionising personalised healthcare and better understanding the ageing process. MethodsWe analysed data from the IAM Frontier longitudinal study that collected extensive data from 30 healthy individuals over the timespan of 13 months: DNA methylation data, clinical biochemistry, proteomics and metabolomics measurements as well as data from physical health examinations. For each individual, biological age (BA) and health traits predictions were computed from 29 epigenetic clocks, 4 clinical-biochemistry clocks, 2 proteomics clocks, and 3 metabolomics clocks. FindingsWithin the BA prediction framework, comprehensive analyses can discover deviations in biological ageing. Our study shows that the within-person BA predictions at different time points are more similar to each other than the between-person predictions at the same time point, indicating that the ageing process is different between individuals but relatively stable within individuals. Individual-based analyses show interesting findings for three study participants, including observed hematological problems, that further supported and complemented by the current gold standard clinical laboratory profiles. InterpretationOur analyses indicate that BA predictions can serve as instruments for explaining many biological phenomena and should be considered crucial biomarkers that can complement routine medical tests. With omics becoming routinely measured in regular clinical settings, omics-based BA predictions can be added to the lab results to give a supplementary outlook assisting decision-making in doctors assessments. Funding-
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigation of Genetic Variants and Causal Biomarkers Associated with Brain Aging 95%
- DNA methylation across the genome in aged human skeletal muscle tissue and stem cells: The role of HOX genes and physical activity 93%
- Obesity and accelerated epigenetic aging in a high-risk cohort of children 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pleiotropy and Disease Interactors: The Dual Nature of Genes Linking Ageing and Ageing-related Diseases 92%
- Host genetics and diet jointly shape the microbiome of Drosophila melanogaster but do not predict lifespan or age-related traits 91%
- The frailty syndrome as an emergent state of parallel dysregulation in multiple physiological systems 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The molecular landscape of premature aging diseases defined by multilayer network exploration 93%
- A Glance into the Density of Transcriptomic Activity, Embodied by the HOX Genes, in Neonatal and Aging Dermal Cells 91%
- Defining Mitochondrial Cristae Morphology Changes Induced by Aging in Brown Adipose Tissue 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.