Back

Meta-analysis comparing the effect of combined acupuncture plus statin therapy versus statin therapy alone on lipid levels of patients with angina pectoris of coronary heart disease

Yan, Z.; Liu, M.; Wu, x.; Xiong, J.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Yang, X.; Liu, M.

2024-02-16 endocrinology
10.1101/2024.02.14.24302641
Show abstract

ObjectivesEstablish clinical evidence regarding acupuncture combined with statin for blood lipid control in patients with angina pectoris (AP) of coronary heart disease (CHD) by systematically analyzing data from all available studies. DesignA systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sourcesThe literature search involved eight databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Wanfang, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) and was finished on February 1, 2024. Eligibility criteriaRandom controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of acupuncture combined with statin on lipid levels in patients with AP of CHD were eligible. The outcomes assessed were the lipid metabolism indicators, including TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C, as well as the safety of the treatment. Data extraction and synthesisData extraction and quality evaluation were conducted by two independent reviewers, with any discrepancies discussed by a third researcher. Pooled mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were carried out to explore the heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot. The quality of the evidence was evaluated using the GRADE system. ResultsThe final meta-analysis included nine eligible studies involving 754 patients. When comparing statin group, the acupuncture plus statin group showed lower levels of TC (MD=-0.48, 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.35, P<0.00001), TG (MD=-0.59, 95% CI: -0.86 to -0.32, P<0.00001), LDL-C (MD=-0.66, 95% CI: -0.99 to -0.33, P=0.0001), and higher levels of HDL-C (MD=0.16, 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.26, P=0.001). Each study included in the analysis exhibited some degree of bias. Significant publication bias was detected for the primary outcomes. Evidence quality for the primary outcomes was graded as very low. ConclusionsAcupuncture as an adjunctive treatment can further improve lipid profile in individuals diagnosed with AP of CHD based on statin therapy. However, the clinical significance of this effect remains unclear; it is necessary to confirm the findings through more high-quality RCTs in the future. Trial registration numberPROSPERO CRD42023465292. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIThis comprehensive systematic review will collect data regarding the combined therapy (acupuncture + statin) on lipid profiles in patients with AP of CHD to provide new evidence supporting the use of acupuncture treatment for AP of CHD. C_LIO_LISubgroup analysis based on the duration of intervention and types of acupuncture will provide a more detailed evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined therapy. C_LIO_LIA thorough evaluation of the quality of the evidence for the primary outcomes was conducted using the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system. C_LIO_LIThis review has limited ability to draw clear conclusions due to poor quality of evidence. C_LIO_LIWe restricted the literature search to eight electronic databases and ignored a search for gray literature, which may miss important literature and could introduce publication bias. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 2%
7.6%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 57%
7.6%
3
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 18%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 0.6%
6.4%
5
Medicine
based on 29 papers
Top 0.8%
5.9%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 3%
4.5%
7
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
4.5%
8
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 2%
4.5%
9
JMIR Research Protocols
based on 18 papers
Top 0.6%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
2.8%
11
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
2.3%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
based on 18 papers
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 2%
2.3%
14
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 11%
1.8%
15
Nutrients
based on 43 papers
Top 3%
1.8%
16
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
17
BioMed Research International
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Pharmacology
based on 27 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Heliyon
based on 57 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
based on 21 papers
Top 0.9%
1.3%
21
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 14%
1.3%
22
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
23
Annals of Translational Medicine
based on 14 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 18%
1.3%
25
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
26
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.2%
27
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 84%
0.8%
28
BMC Medical Research Methodology
based on 41 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
29
Schizophrenia
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%