Impact of a novel comprehensive empathy curriculum at Leicester Medical School: Protocol for a longitudinal study
Keshtkar, L.; Bennett-Weston, A.; ward, A.; Winter, R.; Gay, S.; Howick, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundEmpathy appears to decline throughout medical school and is highly variable among qualified healthcare practitioners. To address these problems, the Leicester Medical School has designed an enhanced empathy curriculum that runs throughout all five years of medical school. The impact of this curriculum must be measured. ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of the enhanced empathy curriculum using qualitative and quantitative data. Study designProspective longitudinal study SettingLeicester medical school ParticipantsAll students (from year one to five) at the Leicester Medical School will be eligible for participation. There are currently approximately 300 students in each of the five years of medical school and we anticipate that we will recruit approximately 100 medical students per medical school year for the quantitative data (total of 500 students) and approximately 10 students per medical school year for the qualitative data (total of 50 students). Data collectionWe will annually collect the following data for a period of seven years to ensure a comprehensive dataset for three full cohorts of medical students. The main reason for selecting the seven-year timeframe is that the empathy curriculum recently started in medical school (2022-2023 academic year), and it takes a few years for it to stabilise and yield meaningful results. O_LIStudent empathy levels (for example, using the student version of the self-reported Jefferson Scale for Empathy (JSE-S) and the observer-reported Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure). C_LIO_LISatisfaction with the empathy curriculum (using routinely collected student survey data). C_LIO_LISatisfaction with the overall medical school curriculum (using routinely collected student survey data). C_LIO_LIStudent experiences of the empathy curriculum (using qualitative student interviews with a purposive sample of five to 10 medical students from each year). C_LIO_LIStudent well-being data (for example, the frequency and severity of well-being issues). C_LI Reporting elementsWe will report on: O_LINumber of individuals at each stage of the study. C_LIO_LIDescriptive data that includes (student characteristics and potential confounders). C_LIO_LIOutcome data (empathy levels, student satisfaction with curriculum, student experience). We will also report on the relationships between these data (for example between empathy levels and student satisfaction with curriculum). C_LI DisseminationFindings will be disseminated through international conferences, news and peer-reviewed journals. FundingThis study is funded by the Stoneygate Trust. The funder had no role in any part of the development or writing of this paper. EthicsThe project and associated documents were approved by the University of Leicester Research Ethics Board (Ethical approval number: 42404-lk252-ls:medicine).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 94%
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- A mixed methods study protocol to develop and pilot a Competency Assessment Tool to support therapists in the care of patients with blunt CHest trauma (CATCh Study) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 96%
- Evaluation of Statistical Illiteracy in Latin American Clinicians and of the Efficacy of a 10-Hour Course 94%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socioeconomic, racial and ethnic differences in patient experience of clinician empathy: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Physiotherapy Under Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study on The Interplay Between Perfectionism, Moral Injury, and Burnout 94%
- Impacts of lack of pocket money on undergraduate students' clinical learning activities 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Modified Delphi Consensus-based Comprehensive Checklist and Angoff Standard for Assessment of Competency in Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria Determination 92%
- A core outcome set for adult general ICU patients 90%
- An international factorial vignette-based survey of intubation decisions in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering the compounding effects of COVID-19 and racism on mental health disparities among biomedical PhD and MD students 91%
- Cancer risk perception and knowledge and physician communication behaviors: specific influences on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening in women 50-65 years old 89%
- Addressing cultural and knowledge barriers to enable preclinical sex inclusive research 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.