Back

Association of red cell distribution width to albumin ratio with risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality: two prospective cohort studies

Hao, M.; Jiang, S.; Li, X.; Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Tang, J.; hu, z.; Zhang, H.

2024-01-12 epidemiology
10.1101/2024.01.10.24301123 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe red cell distribution width to albumin ratio (RAR) has emerged as a reliable prognostic marker for mortality in various diseases. However, whether RAR is associated with mortality remains unknown in the general population. ObjectiveExplore whether RAR is associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality, and to elucidate the dose-response relationship between them. MethodsThis study included 50622 participants aged 18+ years from US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), and 418950 participants aged 37+ years from UK Biobank. The potential association between RAR and the risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality was evaluated by Cox proportional hazard models. Restricted cubic spline regressions were applied to estimate the possible nonlinear relationships. ResultsNHANES documented 7590 deaths over a median follow-up of 9.4 years, and UK Biobank documented 36793 deaths over a median follow-up of 14.5 years. In multivariable analysis, elevated RAR were significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (NHANES: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.81-1.93; UK Biobank: HR: 2.01, 95% CI: 1.96-2.06), as well as mortality due to malignant neoplasms, heart disease, cerebrovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, diabetes mellitus, and others in both the two cohorts (all P-value < 0.05). ConclusionsHigher baseline RAR was strongly and independently associated with increased risk of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population. RAR was a promising indicator that simply, reliably, and inexpensively accessible for identifying high-risk of mortality in clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.