Back

Cognitive impairment is a risk factor for long-term outcomes in septic patients: A retrospective observational study

Koami, H.; Sakamoto, Y.; Furukawa, Y.; Mouri, K.; Matsuoka, A.; Shinada, K.; Nakayama, K.; Iwanaga, S.; Narumi, S.; Koba, M.

2024-01-07 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2024.01.04.24300855 medRxiv
Show abstract

The importance of long-term outcomes after sepsis has been increasingly emphasized in recent years; however, little is known about the relationship between pre-sepsis patient characteristics and long-term outcomes. This study examined the impact of patient characteristics pre-admission, specifically physical, cognitive, and emotional disorders, on long-term clinical outcomes of sepsis. From August 2014 to July 2016, this study included adult patients admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis who were followed up for one year. These 76 patients were classified as Survivors (n=31) or Deceased (n=45), based on their one-year outcomes. In this single-center, retrospective study, 59% of sepsis patients died within one year. Multiple logistic regression models employing significant parameters from univariate analysis revealed that cognitive impairment (CI) is an independent risk factor for 1-year outcome [OR 0.184, 95% CI 0.047-0.722, P=0.0152]. Furthermore, through another univariate analysis and a log-rank test between the CI group and the Control group, created by reclassifying the same 76 patients, CI was significantly associated with a lower 1- year survival rate (25.0% vs 50.0%, P=0.03, log-rank P=0.0332). The composite outcome of either death or being bedridden at the point of discharge was also significantly higher in the CI group than the Control group (100.0% vs 75.0%, P=0.0028). These results indicate that pre-septic CI is a reliable, independent predictor of poor long-term clinical outcomes for sepsis patients.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.