Cognitive impairment is a risk factor for long-term outcomes in septic patients: A retrospective observational study
Koami, H.; Sakamoto, Y.; Furukawa, Y.; Mouri, K.; Matsuoka, A.; Shinada, K.; Nakayama, K.; Iwanaga, S.; Narumi, S.; Koba, M.
Show abstract
The importance of long-term outcomes after sepsis has been increasingly emphasized in recent years; however, little is known about the relationship between pre-sepsis patient characteristics and long-term outcomes. This study examined the impact of patient characteristics pre-admission, specifically physical, cognitive, and emotional disorders, on long-term clinical outcomes of sepsis. From August 2014 to July 2016, this study included adult patients admitted to our hospital with a diagnosis of sepsis who were followed up for one year. These 76 patients were classified as Survivors (n=31) or Deceased (n=45), based on their one-year outcomes. In this single-center, retrospective study, 59% of sepsis patients died within one year. Multiple logistic regression models employing significant parameters from univariate analysis revealed that cognitive impairment (CI) is an independent risk factor for 1-year outcome [OR 0.184, 95% CI 0.047-0.722, P=0.0152]. Furthermore, through another univariate analysis and a log-rank test between the CI group and the Control group, created by reclassifying the same 76 patients, CI was significantly associated with a lower 1- year survival rate (25.0% vs 50.0%, P=0.03, log-rank P=0.0332). The composite outcome of either death or being bedridden at the point of discharge was also significantly higher in the CI group than the Control group (100.0% vs 75.0%, P=0.0028). These results indicate that pre-septic CI is a reliable, independent predictor of poor long-term clinical outcomes for sepsis patients.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clustering ICU patients with sepsis based on the patterns of their circulating biomarkers: a secondary analysis of the CAPTAIN prospective multicenter cohort study 96%
- Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory findings for patients of different age groups with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a hospital in Saudi Arabia 95%
- Assessment of oxidative stress markers in elderly patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and potential prognostic implications. An observational study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 96%
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 95%
- Application of physiological network mapping in the prediction of survival in critically ill patients with acute liver failure 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 96%
- Evaluation of triage checklist for mild COVID-19 outpatients in predicting subsequent emergency department visits and hospitalization during isolation period 94%
- Administration of tocilizumab to patients with high concentrations of IL-6 in the course of COVID-19 is associated with a better prognosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Associations with Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in COVID-19 Patients upon Admission: A Model for Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in 329 Unvaccinated, Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients 94%
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 93%
- Towards definitions of critical illness and critical care using concept analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 95%
- Clinical findings in critical ill patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 in Guangdong Province, China: a multi-center, retrospective, observational study 94%
- Androgen receptor pathway activity assay for sepsis diagnosis and prediction of favorable prognosis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.