Accuracy, Utility and Applicability of the WHOOP Wearable Monitoring Device in Health, Wellness and Performance - a systematic review
Riham, R.; Kamal, L.; Minerbi, A.; Gupta, G.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe WHOOP wearable device is gaining popularity in clinical and performance applications with the ability to track sleep and heart rate parameters and provide feedback on recovery and strain. With the claims on potential benefits, a critical evaluation of the underlying scientific literature and the accuracy of these devices is imperative. MethodsAuthors systematically reviewed studies examining the accuracy and clinical applications of the WHOOP device. ResultsThe WHOOP appears to have acceptable accuracy for two-stage sleep and heart rate metrics, but depending on the study, room for improvement for four-stage sleep and heart rate variability identification. There are numerous preliminary studies looking at the WHOOPs ability to track and/or influence sleep and exercise behaviours at the cohort and/or population level. The impact of athletic performance and/or objective sleep is limited based on existing studies. DiscussionThe clinical application for the WHOOP, given the acceptable accuracy levels, continues to expand. Uses have included impact on sports performance, correlation with medical conditions (i.e. cognitive dysfunction), sleep and health behaviours in various populations. Limitations of existing accuracy trials include variable design and reporting metrics, while results from non-accuracy trials require further clinical validation for response rate and effect size. ConclusionThe WHOOP wearable device has acceptable accuracy for sleep and cardiac variables to be used in clinical studies where a baseline can be established and, ideally, other clinical outcomes and gold standard tools can be employed.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving Memory via Automated Targeted Memory Reactivation during Sleep 94%
- Looking for a reference for large datasets: relative reliability of visual and automatic sleep scoring 94%
- Two years after lockdown: longitudinal trajectories of sleep disturbances and mental health over the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of age, gender, and chronotype 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic approach-avoidance tendency toward physical activity, sedentary, and neutral stimuli as a function of age, explicit affective attitude, and intention to be active 86%
- Improved accuracy of the whole body Center of Mass position through Kalman filtering 86%
- Comparing electromyography, accelerometry, and visual inspection to assess the resting motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation 84%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sleep and Alcohol Use Patterns During Federal Holidays in the United States 90%
- Comparisons of Heart Rate Variability Responses to Head-up Tilt With and Without Abdominal and Lower-Extremity Compression in Healthy Young Individuals: A Randomized Crossover Study 88%
- Effective Assessments of a Short-duration Poor Posture on Upper Limb Muscle Fatigue before Physical Exercise 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of an Electroencephalography-Measuring Headband or Actigraphy Compared with Polysomnography in Older Adults with Sleep Disturbances 94%
- Evaluation of Dreem headband for sleep staging and EEG spectral analysis in people living with Alzheimer’s and older adults 93%
- Melatonin suppression does not automatically alter sleepiness, vigilance, sensory processing, or sleep 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.