Back

Effects of long-term high dose aspartame on body mass, bone strength, femoral geometry, and microbiota composition in a young and aged cohort of male and female mice

Cyphert, E. L.; Liu, C.; Morales, A. L.; Nixon, J. C.; Blackford, E.; Garcia, M.; Cevallos, N.; Turnbaugh, P. J.; Brito, I. L.; Booth, S. L.; Hernandez, C. J.

2024-01-03 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.01.02.573970 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecent reassessment of the safety of aspartame has prompted increased evaluation of its effect on the health of a range of tissues. The gut microbiome is altered by oral aspartame. One prior study suggested that changes in the microbiome caused by aspartame could influence the strength of bone in young skeletally developing mice. Here we ask how aspartame influences bone in mice of different age and sex. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the effect of aspartame on the bone strength and gut microbiota of young and aged mice. MethodsMale and female C57Bl/6J mice were untreated or treated with a high dose of aspartame in their drinking water from 1 month of age until 4 (young cohort; n = 80) or 22 months (aged cohort; n = 52). ResultsIn aged males, mice treated with aspartame had greater body mass, whole bone strength, and femoral geometry relative to untreated. Specifically, in aged males, aspartame led to 9% increase in body mass (p < 0.001), 22% increase in whole bone strength (p = 0.006), and 17% increase in section modulus (p < 0.001) relative to untreated mice. Aged males and females receiving aspartame had a different microbiota than untreated mice and a decreased abundance of Odoribacter. No differences in body mass, whole bone strength, or femoral geometry were associated with aspartame dosing in young males or young or aged females. ConclusionsAspartame treated aged males had greater whole bone strength and the effect appeared to be explained by greater body mass. Aspartame treatment did not alter whole bone strength in young males or young or aged females despite the aspartame having a similar effect on the microbiota of both aged males and females.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.0%
4
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
8
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
9
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.3%
10
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
15
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
17
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
22
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%