Five dominant dimensions of brain aging are identified via deep learning: associations with clinical, lifestyle, and genetic measures
Yang, Z.; Wen, J.; Erus, G.; Govindarajan, S. T.; Melhem, R.; Mamourian, E.; Cui, Y.; Srinivasan, D.; Abdulkadir, A.; Parmpi, P.; Wittfeld, K.; Grabe, H. J.; Bulow, R.; Frenzel, S.; Tosun, D.; Bilgel, M.; An, Y.; Yi, D.; Marcus, D. S.; LaMontagne, P.; Benzinger, T. L. S.; Heckbert, S. R.; Austin, T. R.; Waldstein, S. R.; Evans, M. K.; Zonderman, A. B.; Launer, L. J.; Sotiras, A.; Espeland, M. A.; Masters, C. L.; Maruff, P.; Fripp, J.; Toga, A.; O'Bryant, S.; Chakravarty, M. M.; Villeneuve, S.; Johnson, S. C.; Morris, J. C.; Albert, M. S.; Yaffe, K.; Volzke, H.; Ferrucci, L.; Bryan, N. R.; Shin
Show abstract
AbstractBrain aging is a complex process influenced by various lifestyle, environmental, and genetic factors, as well as by age-related and often co-existing pathologies. MRI and, more recently, AI methods have been instrumental in understanding the neuroanatomical changes that occur during aging in large and diverse populations. However, the multiplicity and mutual overlap of both pathologic processes and affected brain regions make it difficult to precisely characterize the underlying neurodegenerative profile of an individual from an MRI scan. Herein, we leverage a state-of-the art deep representation learning method, Surreal-GAN, and present both methodological advances and extensive experimental results that allow us to elucidate the heterogeneity of brain aging in a large and diverse cohort of 49,482 individuals from 11 studies. Five dominant patterns of neurodegeneration were identified and quantified for each individual by their respective (herein referred to as) R-indices. Significant associations between R-indices and distinct biomedical, lifestyle, and genetic factors provide insights into the etiology of observed variances. Furthermore, baseline R-indices showed predictive value for disease progression and mortality. These five R-indices contribute to MRI-based precision diagnostics, prognostication, and may inform stratification into clinical trials.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual bioenergetic capacity as a potential source of resilience to Alzheimer’s disease 98%
- AI-driven fusion of neurological work-up for assessment of biological Alzheimer’s disease 97%
- Cell-type-specific Alzheimer’s disease polygenic risk scores are associated with distinct disease processes in Alzheimer’s disease 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrative Network Analysis Reveals Novel Moderators of Aβ-Tau Interaction in Alzheimer's Disease 96%
- Higher levels of myelin are associated with higher resistance against tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease 96%
- Differential effects of aging, Alzheimer's pathology, and APOE4 on longitudinal functional connectivity and episodic memory in older adults 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knockout of the longevity gene Klotho perturbs aging- and Alzheimer's disease-linked brain microRNAs and tRNA fragments 96%
- Improving genetic risk modeling of dementia from real-world data in underrepresented populations 95%
- Detecting the effect of genetic diversity on brain composition in an Alzheimer's disease mouse model 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adherence to Life’s Essential 8 is associated with delayed white matter aging 97%
- Prediction of brain age using structural magnetic resonance imaging: A comparison of clinical validity of publicly available software packages 95%
- Integrative deep immune profiling of the elderly reveals systems-level signatures of aging, sex, smoking, and clinical traits 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Human brain cell-type-specific aging clocks based on single-nuclei transcriptomics 96%
- Heterogeneous metabolomic aging across the same age and prediction of health outcome 95%
- Gompertz law based biological age (GOLD BioAge): a simple and practical measurement of biological aging to capture morbidity and mortality risks 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.