Fracture risk among stroke survivors according to post-stroke disability status and stroke type
Lee, D.; Cho, I. Y.; Chang, W. H.; Yoo, J. E.; Choi, H. L.; Park, J.; Shin, D. W.; Han, K.-D.
Show abstract
BackgroundStroke survivors face physical and cognitive challenges, including impaired coordination and balance, which can lead to an increased dependency and a higher risk of falls. We aimed to investigate the impact of post-stroke disability status and stroke type on the risk of fracture at various sites compared to a matched comparison group. MethodThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Korean National Health Insurance System database (2010-2018) and included a total of 223,358 stroke patients and a 1:1 matched comparison group. Stroke survivors were grouped based on the presence and severity of their post-stroke disability and stroke type. The primary outcome was the incidence of newly diagnosed fracture. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to calculate the hazard ratios of fractures after adjusting for potential confounders. ResultsStroke survivors had an increased risk of overall fractures compared to the matched comparison group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-1.43). Specifically, the risk of hip fractures was even greater for stroke survivors: aHR 2.42, 95% CI 2.30-2.55. The risk of vertebral fractures (aHR 1.29, 95% CI 1.25-1.34) and other fractures (aHR 1.19, 95% CI 1.15-1.23) also was higher than that of the control group. The risk of hip fractures was highest among stroke survivors with severe post-stroke disability (aHR 4.82, 95% CI 4.28-5.42), while the risk of vertebral or other fractures was highest among those with mild post-stroke disability. There was no significant difference in fracture risk between hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke survivors when stratified by disability status. ConclusionOur findings showed an increased risk of subsequent fractures among stroke survivors, particularly those with post-stroke disability and for hip fracture. Bone health assessment and treatment should be emphasized as an essential part of stroke management.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Elevated remnant cholesterol improves prognosis of patients with ischemic stroke and malnutrition: a cohort-based study 94%
- Improvement in Delivery of Ischemic Stroke Treatments but Stagnation of Clinical Outcomes in Young Adults in South Korea 93%
- Blood Pressure Control From 2011 To 2019 In Patients 90 Days After Stroke 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary outcomes of combined treadmill and overground high-intensity interval training in ambulatory chronic stroke 94%
- Associations between cardiovascular risk factors, stroke severity, and post-stroke cognition: a moderated mediation analysis 93%
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified FRAX Score for Prediction of Fall-induced Hip Fractures; The Added Value of Fall Energy, Number, and Social Vulnerability Index 94%
- Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study 92%
- Klotho plasma levels are an independent predictor of mortality in women with acute coronary syndrome 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influence of socioeconomic status on functional outcomes after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- Predictors of survival in patients with ischemic stroke and active cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational study 93%
- Disparities in Access to Vascular Stroke Imaging and Carotid Revascularization: A Population Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circulating interleukin-6 levels and incident ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies 93%
- Adaptive trials in stroke: Current use & future directions 90%
- Frequency of neurological manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 350 studies 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.