Back

The effect of SGLT2 inhibitor on clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and atrial fibrillation

Cho, Y.; Shin, S.-H.; Park, M.; Suh, Y. J.; Park, S.; Jang, J.-H.; Kim, D.-Y.; Kim, S. H.

2023-12-21 endocrinology
10.1101/2023.12.19.23300258 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve clinical outcomes in several populations including type 2 diabetes, chronic renal insufficiency, and heart failure (HF). However, limited data exist on their effects on atrial fibrillation (AF). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Health Insurance Service database. A total of 4,771 patients with type 2 diabetes and AF who were newly prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors or DPP4 inhibitors were selected and matched in a 1:2 ratio by propensity score with 37 confounding variables. We assessed the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on the composite outcome of either HF hospitalization or death compared with DPP4 inhibitors. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 31 months, patients on SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of hospitalizations for HF or mortality compared to those on DPP4 inhibitors (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.44-0.85; P=0.004). SGLT2 inhibitor use was also associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.39-0.94; P=0.025) and CV mortality (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.86; P=0.018), but not of MI (HR 1.22 [95% CI 0.72-2.09]; P=0.461) or stroke (HR 1.00 [95% CI 0.75-1.33]; P=0.980). The incidence of hospitalizations for HF, although statistically insignificant, tended to be lower in the SGLT2 inhibitor group (HR 0.63 [95% CI 0.39-1.02]; P=0.062). ConclusionIn a nationwide cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes and AF, SGLT2 inhibitor was associated with a lower risk of mortality compared to DPP4 inhibitor, which may suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors may be considered as the first-line antidiabetic medication in patients with type 2 diabetes and AF.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.