Back

hURAT1 Transgenic Mouse Model for Evaluating Targeted Urate-Lowering Agents

De, G.; Cai, W.; Yang, M.; Zhao, Q.; Yi, G.; Lin, P.; Chen, A.

2023-11-17 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2023.11.15.567192 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveUrate transporter 1 (URAT1), a well-established urate-lowering therapeutic target for hyperuricemia and gout treatment, expresses in the kidney proximal tubule and is responsible for uric acid (UA) reabsorption. However, non-primate animal models currently used in pharmacological studies failed to evaluate URAT1 inhibitors effectiveness because their URAT1 has a very low UA affinity compared to human URAT1, resulting in a lag in targeting drug screening and novel therapy development for gout treatment. We established a human URAT1 (hURAT1) transgenic knock-in (KI) mouse model to assess uricosuric agents effectiveness and characterize URAT1-caused pathogenesis. MethodsWe generated hURAT1 transgenic mice using CRISPR/Cas9 knock-in technique. mUrat1 knockout was achieved by replacing exon 1 coding sequence with a human SLC22A12 CDS-pA cassette. Based on the above transgenic mice, a hyperuricemia model was further established by hypoxanthine administration. ResultsThe hURAT1-KI mice successfully expressed hURAT1 protein to the apical side of the kidney proximal tubule epithelium, where a native human URAT1 kidney localization in human body. Upon hypoxanthine challenge, the blood UA level was elevated in hURAT1-KI mice, exhibiting an approximately 37% increase compared to wild-type (WT) mice. The elevated blood UA level could be alleviated by hURAT1 inhibitor benzbromarone treatment in the hURAT1-KI mice whereas no response was observed in WT littermates. Therefore, hURAT1 transgenic mice responded well to inhibitors and can be used to evaluate the therapeutic effects. ConclusionThe hURAT1-KI hyperuricaemia mouse model would be valuable for preclinical evaluation of urate-lowering agents toward gout treatment and studying UA metabolic complexities in humans.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.