Educational Mobility, the Pace of Biological Aging, and Lifespan in the Framingham Heart Study
Graf, G.; Aiello, A. E.; Caspi, A.; Kothari, M.; Liu, H.; Moffitt, T. E.; Muennig, P.; Ryan, C. P.; Sugden, K.; Belsky, D. W.
Show abstract
ImportancePeople who complete more education live longer lives with better health. New evidence suggests that these benefits operate through a slowed pace of biological aging. If so, measurements of the pace biological aging could offer intermediate endpoints for studies of how interventions to promote education will impact healthy longevity. ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that upward educational mobility contributes to a slower pace of biological aging and increased longevity. DesignProspective cohort study. SettingWe analyzed data from three generations of participants in the Framingham Heart Study: the Original cohort, enrolled beginning in 1948, the Offspring cohort, enrolled beginning in 1971, and the Gen3 cohort, enrolled beginning in 2002. Follow-up is on-going. Data analysis was conducted during 2022-2023 using data obtained from dbGaP (phs000007.v33). ParticipantsWe constructed a three-generation database to quantify intergenerational educational mobility. We linked mobility data with blood DNA methylation data collected from the Offspring cohort in (2005-2008) (n=1,652) and the Gen3 cohort in 2009-2011 (n=1,449). These n=3,101 participants formed our analysis sample. ExposureWe measured educational mobility by comparing participants educational outcomes with those of their parents. OutcomesWe measured the pace of biological aging from whole-blood DNA-methylation data using the DunedinPACE epigenetic clock. For comparison purposes, we repeated analysis using four other epigenetic clocks. Survival follow-up was conducted through 2019. ResultsParticipants who were upwardly mobile in educational terms tended to have slower DunedinPACE in later life (r=-0.18, 95% CI [-0.23,-0.13], p<0.001). This pattern of association was similar across generations and held in within-family sibling comparisons. 402 Offspring-cohort participants died over the follow-up period. Upward educational mobility was associated with lower mortality risk (HR=0.89, 95% CI [0.81,0.98] p=0.014). Slower DunedinPACE accounted for roughly half of this association. Conclusions and RelevanceOur findings support the hypothesis that interventions to promote educational attainment will slow the pace of biological aging and promote longevity. Epigenetic clocks, like DunedinPACE, have potential as near-term outcome measures of intervention effects on healthy aging. Experimental evidence is needed to confirm findings.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of the pace of biological aging in humans through a blood test: The DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm 96%
- A mathematical model that predicts human biological age from physiological traits identifies environmental and genetic factors that influence aging 96%
- Epigenetic signature of human immune aging: the GESTALT study. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Testing DNA-methylation and blood-chemistry measures of biological aging in models of Black-White disparities in healthspan characteristics 97%
- Association between allostatic load and accelerated white matter brain aging: findings from the UK Biobank 95%
- Racialized experience, biomarkers of lead exposure, and later-life cognition: a mediation analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Timing of Menarche and Menopause and Epigenetic Aging among U.S. Adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2002 96%
- Low Blood Levels of Selenium, Selenoprotein P and GPx3 are Associated with Accelerated Biological Aging: Results from the Berlin Aging Study II (BASE-II) 96%
- Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Epigenetic Aging Across Adolescence and Young Adulthood 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.