Back

A review on human gut microbial diversity in 21 tribal populations from India

Chakraborty, S.; Mollick, S. A.; Roy, B.

2023-11-04 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.11.03.23297350 medRxiv
Show abstract

From the earlier to modern times, the human populations passed through stages of subsistence such as foraging, rural farming and industrialized urban life. Till date various tribal people are living in geographically isolated areas depending on their traditional (gathering/rural farming) food sources. The long term cultural practices and food habits shaped the gut microbiome composition in these populations and contributed to health. However, the population-level study of the gut microbiota in Indian tribes with representative sampling across its geography and subsistence are limited. So, it is important to understand the complexity and diversity of the gut microbiome in healthy tribal populations, studied so far, to explore relationship among food, gut microbiome and health. Here, we reviewed gut microbiome studies which included 21 Indian tribal populations from different geographical regions to understand the role of food, ecology and cultural habits on variation of gut microbiota.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 3%
35.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Cureus
○ 68 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.5%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
4
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
Similar papers in this journal
5
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.3%
7
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
● 466 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
○ 120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
○ 109 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Psychology
○ 56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
BMJ Open
● 601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
12
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
○ 12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
PLOS Digital Health
● 106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
BioMed Research International
○ 28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
17
Environmental Research
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
18
Biomedicines
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
19
Genomics
○ 64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Biomolecules
○ 100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
21
Vaccines
○ 198 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
Current Microbiology
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.