Back

Clinical sarcopenia identification: Justification for increased sensitivity in SARC-F scores for probable sarcopenia

Propst, D.; Biscardi, L.; Dornemann, T.

2023-10-31 primary care research
10.1101/2023.10.31.23297840 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) recommends the use of the 5-item SARC-F questionnaire by clinicians to screen for probable sarcopenia. The recommended threshold of [&ge;]4 has low sensitivity and high specificity in identifying probable sarcopenia. While this high threshold is capable of excluding clients without probable sarcopenia, difficulty lies in using this screening tool to identify clients with low muscle strength. Methods204 community-dwelling older adults (117 male, 87 female) above the age of 65 were screened at their physician visits using the SARC-F. Probable sarcopenia was diagnosed using gender-specific grip strength criteria defined by the EWGSOP2 ([&le;] 27 kg for men, [&le;] 16 kg for women). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine a SARC-F threshold that optimized the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of probable sarcopenia. ResultsProbable sarcopenia was present in 11.8% of participants. There were no differences in age (73.9 {+/-} 6.2 years) or BMI (29.5 {+/-} 5.8 kg/m2) between genders. Males had greater grip strength (36.3 {+/-} 8.1; 22.4 {+/-} 5.5 kg) and lower SARC-F scores (0.92 {+/-} 1.65, 1.88 {+/-} 2.31) than females. The ROC curve identified a SARC-F score of [&ge;]2 as an optimal cutoff between sensitivity and specificity (AUC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67 - 0.88, p < .05). Accuracy (0.77), false positive rate (0.22), positive predictive value (0.31), and negative predictive value (0.96) were also calculated. ConclusionsA SARC-F threshold of [&ge;]2 is recommended as an optimal tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity when identifying community-dwelling older adults with probable sarcopenia. This is lower than the currently accepted recommendation of [&ge;]4. Our findings promote the recommended early detection and treatment by medical professionals by the EWGSOP2 by improving the ability to identify individuals with low muscle strength with this screening procedure.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.