Back

Changes in sleep duration during the long-lasting COVID-19 pandemic: individual and regional disparities

Min, J.; Oh, J.; Lee, W.

2023-10-25 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.10.25.23297531 medRxiv
Show abstract

The adequate quality and quantity of sleep are related to maintaining the immune system and mental well-being; therefore, it is necessary to evaluate sleep duration during COVID-19. This study aimed to investigate the changes in sleep duration during the long-lasting COVID-19 period (2020 and 2021) in South Korea, and to examine the individual and regional disparities. The study population comprised 1,143,460 adults aged [≥]19 years who participated in the 2017- 2021 Korea Community Health Survey excluding those who did not respond to the daily sleep duration questionnaire. For statistical analysis, we first conducted a multiple regression model for 229 districts to estimate the district-specific changes in sleep duration. We then applied a meta-analysis to pool the 229 estimates and a meta-regression to examine the association between changes in sleep duration and regional characteristics. The sleep duration increased by 9.66 (95% CI: 8.53, 10.80) min in 2020 and 3.66 (95% CI: 2.09, 5.22) min in 2021 compared to the pre-pandemic period (2017-2019). The increase was more prominent in males, younger adults, employed individuals, and those with a high socioeconomic status compared to the general population. Communities with a higher proportion of apartments, lower normalized difference vegetation index in summer, and lower practice rate of moderate exercise were associated with a higher increase in sleep duration during the pandemic. The sleep duration increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the increase decreased as the COVID-19 lasted longer. The findings of our study highlight that preventive measures to manage sleep health during a pandemic should be framed in consideration of individual and regional characteristics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.