Back

A blood biomarker of accelerated aging in the body associates with worse structural integrity in the brain: replication across three cohorts

Whitman, E. T.; Ryan, C. P.; Abraham, W. C.; Addae, A.; Corcoran, D. L.; Elliott, M. L.; Hogan, S.; Ireland, D.; Keenan, R.; Knodt, A. R.; Melzer, T. R.; Poulton, R.; Ramrakha, S.; Sugden, K.; Williams, B. S.; Zhou, J.; Hariri, A. R.; Belsky, D. W.; Moffitt, T. E.; Caspi, A.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,

2023-09-08 neurology
10.1101/2023.09.06.23295140 medRxiv
Show abstract

Biological aging is the correlated decline of multi-organ system integrity central to the etiology of many age-related diseases. A novel epigenetic measure of biological aging, DunedinPACE, is associated with cognitive dysfunction, incident dementia, and mortality. Here, we tested for associations between DunedinPACE and structural MRI phenotypes in three datasets spanning midlife to advanced age: the Dunedin Study (age=45 years), the Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort (mean age=63 years), and the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (mean age=75 years). We also tested four additional epigenetic measures of aging: the Horvath clock, the Hannum clock, PhenoAge, and GrimAge. Across all datasets (total N observations=3,380; total N individuals=2,322), faster DunedinPACE was associated with lower total brain volume, lower hippocampal volume, and thinner cortex. In two datasets, faster DunedinPACE was associated with greater burden of white matter hyperintensities. Across all measures, DunedinPACE and GrimAge had the strongest and most consistent associations with brain phenotypes. Our findings suggest that single timepoint measures of multi-organ decline such as DunedinPACE could be useful for gauging nervous system health.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurobiology of Aging
○ 107 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
177 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
3
Human Brain Mapping
○ 329 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
4
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.9%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
○ 74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Imaging Neuroscience
● 282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
○ 144 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
8
NeuroImage
○ 903 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
9
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
10
GeroScience
○ 109 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
11
Cerebral Cortex
◐ 396 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
● 1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
13
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Neurology
○ 50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Molecular Psychiatry
○ 282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Nature Aging
○ 60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Cell Metabolism
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
18
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
○ 116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Brain Communications
◐ 166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Neuroscience
○ 256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
○ 42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.1%
23
Translational Psychiatry
○ 260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
● 2444 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.1%
25
Communications Biology
○ 993 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Neurology
○ 102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Brain
◐ 168 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Molecular Neurodegeneration
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.