Back

Manifestations, Diagnosis and Treatment of Osseous Rosai-Dorfman Disease: A Systematic Review

Agarwal, A.; Abozeed, M.

2023-09-01 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2023.08.30.23294833 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDWe hypothesize that lymphadenopathy and extraosseous manifestation affect the management protocol and our aim is to aid in development of standardized diagnosis and treatment protocols. METHODSPubMed and Google Scholar were searched from January 2012 through December 2022 using keywords "Rosai-Dorfman", "Rosai and Dorfman," and "bone". Out of 98 researches, meta-analysis of 51 full-text studies involving 53 individuals with osseous RDD was conducted. RESULTSA significant association was found between lymphadenopathy with steroid therapy (OR: 20.125, 95%CI: 3.02, 134.09, P=0.0004). Extraosseous RDD showed significant association with steroid therapy (P=0.0145), T1-isointense MRI (OR: 0.173, 95%CI: 0.0304, 0.986, P=0.035), T1-hyperintense MRI (OR: 0.16, 95%CI: 0.0314, 0.815, P=0.019) and T2-hyperintense MRI (OR: 0.115, 95%CI= 0.0206, 0.6456, P=0.007). CONCLUSIONOsseous RDD is rare and lacks standardized diagnosis and treatment protocols. Patients with lymphadenopathy were 9 times more likely to receive steroids, and those with extraosseous manifestations were less likely to undergo MRI. RDD is often not initially considered in differential diagnoses, leading to worsened conditions. We propose that further testing is required in affected individuals to develop standardized protocols. Key PointsO_LIRevealed variations in osseous and extraosseous involvement and immunohistochemistry played a crucial role in diagnosis. C_LIO_LIFound association of lymphadenopathy and extraosseous involvement with steroid therapy and diagnostic modalities of RDD. C_LIO_LILimitations include reliance on case reports (low-quality evidence), potential inclusion bias in reported data. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.