Back

Adaptive Artificial Intelligence to Teach Interactive Molecular Dynamics in the Context of Human-Computer Interaction

Demir, M.; Chen, C. K.; Leahy, S. M.; Mishra, P.; Singharoy, A.

2023-08-28 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.08.26.554965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) can be easily integrated into virtual education to drive adaptive instruction and real-time constructive feedback to students, offering a possible conduit for fostering discovery curiosity in learners. This study examines and characterizes Human-AI-Teaming (HAT) coordination dynamics to monitor the inception of discovery curiosity in online laboratories of interactive molecular dynamics (IMD). We used molecular physics measures (kinetic/ potential energy and action) obtained from simple and complex examples of simulated mouse tracking datasets in IMD log files as a proxy for understanding the context of molecular sciences and developing novel interactions for inquiry. These measures are good features of our HAT context because kinetic energy reflects the systems atoms overall motion regarding the individual atoms speed. While kinetic energy represents if a learner applies artificial forces to the task, potential energy can be AIs response to these forces. The action is a systems-level reaction to the changes during the task. By applying nonlinear dynamical systems methods to the physics measures, we extracted the Largest Lyapunov Exponent and Determinism metrics as HATs coordination stability and predictability, respectively. The findings underline that while the more complex IMD task required less stable and predictable HAT coordination dynamics, the simple task is more. One explanation is that AI needs to anticipate the learner by providing feedback at the right time and place during the more complex IMD task to initiate and sustain the learners discovery curiosity. In IMD, future HAT design should consider coordination dynamics for fostering discovery curiosity and practical learning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.9%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
7
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
12
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
14
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
15
Mathematics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
19
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
IFAC-PapersOnLine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
29
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%