Back

Subgrouping patients with comorbidity between functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: application of multidimensional item response theory and latent profile analysis

Huang, Z.; Lyu, Z.; Liu, F.

2023-08-06 gastroenterology
10.1101/2023.08.03.23293577 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundComorbidity between different subtypes of functional gastrointestinal disorders(FGIDs) is of high prevalence in clinical practice. Heterogeneity of clinical appearances has led to difficulty in individualized diagnosis and comprehensive management of FGIDs. AimsTo discover the hidden clinical patterns of patients with comorbidity between functional dyspepsia(FD) and irritable bowel syndrome(IBS). MethodsIn a retrospective cross-section study, a self-report questionnaire that consist of items indicating 5 different assessing domains including gastrointestinal discomforts, systemic discomforts, psychological disorders, and environmental aggravated factors was used as basic instrument for clinical assessment. With item response theory, the theoretical framework of assessment was evaluated, and latent traits of patient were quantified in the simulated computerized adaptive testing. Latent class analysis was used for uncovering the hidden patterns over the heterogenous clinical appearances. And differences among the profiles were compared referring to the spectrum of clinical appearances and the clinical diagnosis. ResultsWith 996 patients enrolled in the study, the validity and reliability of the instrument were evaluated as adequate (Cronbachs alpha indices =0.72, Split-half reliability =0.84). The construct validity was also evaluated to be adequate with Chi-square/df=3.45, CFI=0.92, GFI=0.96, RMSEA=0.05, TLI=0.90, RMR=0.02. The 7-profile model was evaluated to be with better fitness with Entropy=0.98, Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test-p value<0.01, Bootstrap likelihood ratio test-p value<0.01. And the patterns detailed the heterogeneity of clinical appearance of FGIDs patients either in general condition or discomfort in specific dimension. ConclusionsWith application of multidimensional variable analysis, this article summarized the hidden patterns beneath the heterogenous clinical features. And quantitative approaches helped equip clinician with individualized and comprehensive tool in the management of complex diseases such as FGIDs.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.7%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 13%
7.0%
5
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
18
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
25
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
26
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%