Back

A Metabolic Biomarker Panel for Congenital Heart Disease Assessment with Newborn Dried Blood Spots

Ling, X. B.; Zhang, Y.; Su, K. J.; Tang, Q.; Jin, B.; Chou, C. J.; Schilling, J. W.; Han, Z.; Floyd, B. J.; Whitin, J.; Sylvester, K. G.; Chubb, H.; Luo, R. Y.; Tian, L.; Cohen, H. J.; McElhinney, D.

2023-08-06 pediatrics
10.1101/2023.08.01.23293520 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundCongenital heart disease (CHD) represents a significant contributor to both morbidity and mortality in neonates and children. The prompt recognition of CHD can facilitate timely and appropriate intervention, reducing the probability of complications and enhancing the prognosis for impacted newborns. However, unlike other rare conditions routinely identified through federal and state newborn screening (NBS) programs, theres currently no analogous dried blood spot (DBS) screening for CHD immediately after birth. ObjectiveThis study was set to identify reliable metabolite biomarkers with clinical relevance, with the aim to assess feasibility of screening and subtype classification of CHD utilizing the DBS newborn screening method. MethodsWe assembled a cohort of DBS datasets from the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) Biobank, encompassing both normal controls and three pre-defined CHD categories (tetralogy of Fallot, inherited arrhythmia syndrome, neonatal cardiomyopathy). A robust, DBS-oriented metabolomic method, employing both global and targeted strategies based on liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), was developed. To verify the reliability of this metabolic profiling, we conducted a correlation analysis comparing the absolute quantitated metabolite concentration in DBS against the CDPH NBS records. Additionally, for hydrophilic and hydrophobic metabolites, we executed significant pathway and metabolite analyses respectively. Finally, logistic and LightGBM models were established to aid in CHD discrimination and classification. ResultsOur metabolomic workflow demonstrated consistent and reliable quantification of metabolites in DBS samples stored at the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for up to 15 years. Through this process, we discerned dysregulated metabolic pathways in CHD patients, including deviations in lipid and energy metabolism, as well as oxidative stress pathways. Furthermore, we identified three metabolites as potential biomarkers for CHD assessment, and an additional twelve metabolites as potential markers for classifying different CHD subtypes within DBS samples. ConclusionsThis study represents the first attempt to validate metabolite profiling results using long-term storage DBS samples procured from the high-quality conditions of the CDPH biobank. The results unveil distinct metabolic discrepancies between various CHD subtypes and healthy controls. Furthermore, our findings highlight the potential clinical applications of our DBS-based methods for CHD screening and subtype classification.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
15.8%
3
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.2%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.5%
7
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
8
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
11
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
12
Pediatric Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.0%
14
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
15
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
20
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
21
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
25
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
26
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%
28
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%