Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol of the Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Drug Candidates Targeting Host Enzymes Involved in Immune Response
Mushebenge, A. G.-A.; Ugbaja, S. C.; Mbatha, N. A.; Riziki, M. G.; Muzumbukilwa, T. W.; Kadima, M. G.; Kumalo, H. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionCOVID-19 is a rapidly spreading infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Although several therapeutic interventions have been developed, the mortality rate of the disease remains high, and effective treatment options are urgently needed. Host-directed therapies targeting enzymes involved in the immune response represent a promising strategy for the development of novel therapeutics against COVID-19. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to evaluate the potential of drug candidates targeting host enzymes involved in the immune response for the treatment of COVID-19. Methods and analysisWe will conduct a systematic search of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, as well as preprint servers and clinical trial registries for relevant studies. We will include randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and preclinical studies evaluating the efficacy of drug candidates targeting host enzymes involved in the immune response in COVID-19. Two reviewers will independently screen articles, extract data, and assess study quality. The primary outcome will be the effect of drug candidates on mortality, while secondary outcomes will include time to recovery, adverse events, and changes in immune markers. A meta-analysis will be performed to estimate pooled effect sizes of the interventions, and a narrative synthesis will be conducted for studies that are not amenable to quantitative analysis. This study will provide a comprehensive evaluation of the potential of host-directed therapies targeting enzymes involved in the immune response for the treatment of COVID-19. The results of this study may guide the development of novel therapeutics against COVID-19 and inform clinical practice. Ethics and disseminationThis study will review published data, and thus it is unnecessary to obtain ethical approval. The findings of this systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023415110.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 95%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
- The Effect of Famotidine on Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide combined with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir for the treatment of mild to moderate COVID-19 92%
- A retrospective study evaluating efficacy and safety of compassionate use of tocilizumab in 13 patients with severe-to-critically ill COVID-19: analysis of well-responding cases and rapidly-worsening cases after tocilizumab administration 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the current therapeutic approaches for COVID-19: a meta-analysis 94%
- Molecular mechanism of action of repurposed drugs and traditional Chinese medicine used for the treatment of patients infected with COVID-19: A systematic scoping review 93%
- Innovative, rapid, high throughput method for drug repurposing in a pandemic - a case study of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of Lactococcus lactis strain plasma (LC-Plasma) in easing symptoms in patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): protocol for an exploratory, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (PLATEAU study) 95%
- Efficacy of clarithromycin on COVID-19 pneumonia without oxygen administration; protocol for multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled, 3-armed parallel group comparison, exploratory trial (CAME COVID study) 94%
- Efficacy of remdesivir versus placebo for the treatment of COVID-19: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Therapeutic options against SARS-CoV-2 94%
- Mechanistic rationale of drugs, Primary endpoints, Geographical distribution of clinical trials against Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2: A Systematic Review 93%
- Brilacidin, a COVID-19 Drug Candidate, demonstrates broad-spectrum antiviral activity against human coronaviruses OC43, 229E and NL63 through targeting both the virus and the host cell 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.