Back

icognition: a smartphone-based cognitive screening battery

Denissen, S.; Van Laethem, D.; Baijot, J.; Costers, L.; Descamps, A.; Van Remoortel, A.; Van Merhaegen-Wieleman, A.; D'hooghe, M. B.; D'Haeseleer, M.; Smeets, D.; Sima, D. M.; Van Schependom, J.; Nagels, G.

2023-07-23 neurology
10.1101/2023.07.19.23292824 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTelemedicine is feasible and well-accepted by people with multiple sclerosis (MS). ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to validate a smartphone-based cognitive screening battery, icognition, to faster signal cognitive deterioration. Methodsicognition consists of three tests (Symbol Test, Dot Test and visual Backwards Digit Span (vBDS)) that are equivalents of validated paper-pencil tests. These are the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), the 10/36 Spatial Recall Test (SPART) and the auditory Backwards Digit Span (aBDS), respectively. To establish the validity of icognition, 101 people with MS and 82 healthy subjects completed all tests. 21 healthy subjects repeated testing 2 to 3 weeks later. ResultsAll tests in icognition correlate well with their paper-pencil equivalent (Symbol Test: r=.63, p<.001; Dot Test: r=.31, p=0.002; vBDS: r=.71, p<.001), negatively correlate with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS: Symbol Test: rho=-.27, p=.01; Dot Test: rho=-.29, p=.006; vBDS: rho=- .23, p=.027) and show high test-retest reliability (Symbol Test: r=.81, p<.001; Dot Test: r=.75, p<.001; vBDS: r=.84, p<.001). Test performance was not significantly different between people with MS and healthy subjects for all cognitive tests, both in icognition and their paper-pencil equivalents. Conclusionicognition is a valid and reliable tool to remotely screen for cognitive functioning in persons with MS.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.7%
3
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
5
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
7
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
8
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
9
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
10
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
11
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
16
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
19
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%