Back

Cardiovascular Risks Associated with Patients Infected with Scrub Typhus: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Yeh, J.-K.; Wu, V. C.-C.; Chen, S.-W.; Wu, C.-L.; Lin, Y.-S.; Cheng, C.-W.; Chang, C.-H.; Wu, M.; Chu, P.-H.; Chang, S.-H.; Huang, Y.-T.

2023-07-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.07.17.23292799 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundScrub typhus is an infectious disease that affects multiple organs. However, the long-term cardiovascular (CV) risk in survivors remains unknown. MethodA retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) to investigate the CV risk of scrub typhus survivors from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015. People who had prior CV events before the diagnosis of scrub typhus were excluded. The CV outcomes of interest were acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure hospitalization (HFH), hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), aneurysm or dissection of aorta, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and CV death. ResultA total of 2,269 patients with scrub typhus and without a prior CV event were identified (mean age 47.8{+/-}16.1 years, 38.0% female). The health control cohort (n=2,264) was selected to compare by the frequency matching with age, gender, and co-morbidities with patients with scrub typhus. The incidence of HFH, new-onset AF, and total events was significantly higher among patients with scrub typhus than the control cohort with an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-3.42 for HFH; 2.48, 95% CI: 1.23-5.0 for new-onset AF; 1.43, 95% CI: 1.08-1.91 for total CV events, respectively. The event rates of other outcomes were similar between the two groups. ConclusionIn the cohort study, survivors of scrub typhus are at heightened risk of subsequent CV events, especially for HFH and new-onset AF. These findings serve as an important reminder to physicians regarding the significant CV risk that remains present following acute scrub typhus infection.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.0%
3
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.0%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.0%
5
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
12
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
16
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
19
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
International Immunopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
25
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%