Back

Comparison of robotic automated and manual injection methods in zebrafish embryos for high throughput RNA silencing using CRISPR-CasRx

Abugattas-Nunez Del Prado, J.; Ding, Y.; de Sonneville, J.; van der Kolk, K.-J.; Moreno-Mateos, M. A.; Malaga-Trillo, E.; Spaink, H. P.

2023-07-04 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.07.04.547651 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recently, the CRISPR-RfxCas13d (CasRx) system was proven to induce efficient mRNA knockdown in animal embryos. Here we compared the efficiency of CasRx-based RNA depletion with that of Cas9-mediated DNA targeting under the same conditions, using automated robotic and manual injection methods. As a proof-of-principle target, we used the no tail (tbxta) gene in zebrafish embryos, for which knockdown and knockout embryonic phenotypes were easy to be scored. Both Cas9 and CasRx systems induced loss of function phenotypes of tbxta gene. Higher percentage of severe phenotype was observed using Cas9 protein compared to the mRNA while the efficiency was similar in terms of Cas13d protein and mRNA. In addition, both the robotic and manual injection approaches yielded similar percentages of phenotypes and mortality rates. Therefore, our study not only showcases the potential of RNA-targeting CRISPR effectors for precise and potent gene knockdown, but also emphasizes automated microinjection in zebrafish embryos as an excellent alternative to manual methods for achieving gene knockdown at a high throughput level.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The CRISPR Journal
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.0%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
4
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.0%
5
BMC Biotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
9
STAR Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.7%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
12
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
16
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.0%
19
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Insect Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%