Identification of Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteomic Signatures Associated with Intramedullary Surgery Outcome
Di, W.; Gu, W.; Peng, X.; Shou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Ge, S.; Gu, S.; Zhao, J.
Show abstract
Abstracts ImportanceNeurological function recovery after intramedullary microsurgery is susceptible to various factors. Investigating alterations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) protein profiles associated with spinal function recovery could provide valuable insights into prognosis and the development of postoperative therapeutic approaches. ObjectiveThe aim of this research was to identify CSF protein sets linked to recovery outcomes of intramedullary microsurgery. DesignThis research is an observational cohort investigation that collected data from August 2020 to March 2023. SettingThe Neurospine group conducted this single-centered cohort research (http://www.chictr.org.cn, registration ID: ChiCTR2300072704). Participants were followed up for 6 months or more. CSF samples were collected pre-and postoperatively. Perioperative treatments, neurological deficits, and rehabilitation therapies were recorded. ParticipantsThe Neurospine group screened adult patients with intramedullary lesions scheduled for surgical intervention. The exclusion criteria included prior spinal surgery, neurological disorders, surgical complications, or relevant medications. ExposuresThe patients underwent standard intramedullary microsurgical procedures, received medications, and underwent assessments. The CSF protein profiles were examined using tandem mass spectrometry. Main outcomes and measuresThe evaluation of spinal function recovery involved various assessments and correlation analysis was performed. In addition, CSF protein features were identified and their clinical associations were assessed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression modeling. ResultsOf the 43 patients who completed follow-up assessments, 23 were women and 20 were men, with a mean age of 42.8{+/-}11.8 years. Histological diagnoses confirmed invasive lesions in 20 patients. Twenty-three patients demonstrated stable or improved spinal function, while 20 patients experienced deterioration during the 3rd and 6th month follow-ups. As indicated by the changes in EMS scales (P = 0.02) and JOA scores (P = 0.03), functional prognosis was associated with pathological characteristics. We developed four models using the CSF proteomics datasets of noninvasive and invasive patients. These LASSO regression models exhibited high accuracy in predicting the recovery rates of the corresponding groups (P > 0.99). Conclusions and relevanceThis research demonstrates that lesion sizes and pathological characteristics are significant factors influencing spinal function recovery. The LASSO regression models developed using identified CSF protein variables for invasive and noninvasive patients, respectively, offer novel methods for the prediction of prognosis and the development of therapeutic approaches.
Matching journals
The top 17 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural Progression of Routine Laboratory Markers following Spinal Trauma: A Longitudinal, Multi-Cohort Study 93%
- Extent of cord pathology in the lumbosacral enlargement in non-traumatic versus traumatic spinal cord injury 93%
- The Therapy Intensity Level scale for traumatic brain injury: clinimetric assessment on neuro-monitored patients across 52 European intensive care units 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteomic profiling of plasma extracellular vesicles identifies signatures of innate immunity, coagulation, and endothelial activation in septic patients 93%
- Comparative Neuroanatomy of the Lumbosacral Spinal Cord of the Rat, Cat, Pig, Monkey, and Human 92%
- Nanocatalytic activity of clean-surfaced, faceted nanocrystalline gold enhances remyelination in animal models of multiple sclerosis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.