Patient-centered approaches for family planning counseling and support: A systematic review.
Meekers, D.; Elkins, A.; Obozekhai, V.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis paper identifies how patient-centered family planning care has been defined, conceptualized, and measured, describes tools to make family planning care more patient-centered, and discusses their impact on patient satisfaction and family planning outcomes. MethodsWe systematically searched PubMed and SCOPUS for documents on "patient-centered family planning counseling or support" published between 2013 and 2022. Eligibility criteria included discussion of 1) a strategy for providing patient-centered care, 2) an intervention that used a patient- centered approach, or 3) evidence of the impact of patient-centered approaches. We excluded documents that only recommended using patient-centered approaches. To assess how studies conceptualized patient-centered care, we reviewed how the concept was measured. We identified tools for patient-centered care, and mapped them against the main domains of patient-centered care. We reported the available evidence of the impact on those tools without further statistical analysis. ResultsOur review is based on 33 documents, including three theoretical articles and three systematic reviews. Nine studies addressed womens experiences with family planning counseling, five discussed instruments for measuring the patient-centeredness of care, ten discussed tools for patient-centered family planning, and three discussed broader counseling programs. We identified important differences in how patient-centered family planning care was defined and measured, although most studies emphasized patients needs and preferences, respect for the patient, and informed decision-making. We identified six tools for increasing the patient-centeredness of family planning counseling. None of the tools addressed all domains of patient-centered care. Evidence about the impact of these tools is scarce. Overall, the tools appeared well accepted by both providers and patients. There was some evidence that the tools improved patients perception about the quality of care, but no evidence that the tools improved family planning outcomes. DiscussionLimitations of our study include that our search was restricted to two databases, and that the studies predominantly focused on Western countries which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Wider use of existing scales to measure patient-centered family planning care may help standardize the definition of patient-centered care and strengthen the evidence base. Although tools for patient-centered care improve the patient experience, there is a need to identify strategies for translating this into improved family planning outcomes. In addition, there is a need to test patient- centered approaches in a wider range of settings.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 90%
- Ensuring a successful transition from Pap to HPV-based primary screening in Canada: a study protocol to investigate the psychosocial correlates of women’s screening intentions 90%
- The Womens Wellness After Giving Birth Program (WWAGBP) for Vietnamese women: A single-arm trial protocol 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Knowledge and use of lactational amenorrhea as a family planning method among adolescent mothers in Uganda: a secondary analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys between 2006 and 2016 94%
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 93%
- Positive deviance for promoting dual-method contraceptive use among women in Uganda: a cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Competency assessment of the medical interns and nurses and prevailing practices to provide family planning services in teaching hospitals in three states of India. 92%
- Uptake of Intrauterine Contraception after Medical Management of First Trimester Incomplete Abortion: A Cross-sectional study in central Uganda 92%
- Opening the digital doorway to sexual healthcare: Recommendations from a Behaviour Change Wheel analysis of barriers and facilitators to seeking online sexual health information and support among underserved populations 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Contraceptive use and pregnancy planning in Britain during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from a large, quasi-representative survey (Natsal-COVID) 93%
- The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale: clinical considerations and comparison with other questions about pregnancy preferences 93%
- Mapping of person-centred sexual and reproductive health interventions at primary healthcare settings: An umbrella review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Facilitators and barriers to contraception access and use for Hispanic American adolescent women: An integrative literature review 93%
- Factors associated with contraceptive use among reproductive-age women during a pandemic: Evidence from a small developing state 92%
- Female Sex Worker Preferences for HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Delivery in Uganda: A Discrete Choice Experiment 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.