Machine learning to construct an mRPS risk prognostic model for directing immunotherapy in patients with breast cancer based on the mCAF signature genes
Shen, H.; Huang, B.; Chen, Q.; Ye, Z.; Zeng, L.; Huang, C.; Xie, Y.; Zhang, R.
Show abstract
Withdrawal statementThe authors have withdrawn their manuscript owing to the identification of inadequate informed consent procedures in this research. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 96%
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 93%
- Directed Bayesian Networks established functional differences between breast cancer subtypes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of BRCA mutation status on tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), response to treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 95%
- Hormone Receptor-status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape 94%
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Landscape of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Tumour Microenvironment Identifies a Prognostic and Immunotherapeutically Relevant Gene Signature 93%
- Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning on Primary Tumor Biopsy Slides 93%
- Improving prognosis of surrogate assay for breast cancer patients by absolute quantitation of Ki67 protein levels using Quantitative Dot Blot (QDB) method 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.